PO.TB10.07 · 肿瘤生物学
通过多重复验证和跨切片分析建立Xenium空间转录组学的可重复性标准
Establishing reproducibility standards for Xenium spatial transcriptomics through multi-replicate validation and cross-sectional analysis
该海报暂无可下载的资料
AACR 官方页面
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
Xenium等空间转录组学技术在转化和临床研究中的相关性正迅速上升,但仍缺乏标准化的可重复性基准和定量质量控制(QC)指标。随着该领域向受监管环境迈进,建立技术验证框架对于确保跨运行、跨切片乃至最终跨中心的可比性至关重要。
方法:我们开展了一项多重复验证研究,使用来自单一FFPE蜡块的8张切片,该蜡块包含4种人类癌组织(肺、乳腺、结肠和胃)。每张玻片包含4个组织区域,使用Xenium人类多组织与癌症基因表达面板(10x Genomics)共生成32个空间转录组数据集。在特定深度(X3-4、X14-15、X16-17、X20-21)的切片能够评估玻片间和深度依赖性变异的技术可重复性。评估了技术可重复性指标,包括重复间相关性、变异系数、空间模式一致性、细胞类型丰度稳定性和基因水平方差,以确定适用于多重复基准测试的初步QC阈值。
结果:初步分析显示各重复间具有高度可重复性,基因表达谱一致、主要细胞群的空间组织稳定、连续深度间方差较低。空间模式一致性在所有癌症类型中保持稳健,方差分解提示与深度相关的技术漂移极小。正在进行的分析包括扩展的统计建模和对可作为平台验证标准化标准的QC阈值的评估。
结论:本研究建立了一个定义Xenium空间转录组学可重复性和QC标准的实用框架。通过将多重复评估与跨切片比较相结合,我们勾勒出支持临床转化、监管就绪以及跨研究和跨机构协调统一的可重复空间数据生成基础。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Spatial transcriptomics technologies such as Xenium are rapidly gaining relevance in translational and clinical research, yet there remains a lack of standardized reproducibility benchmarks and quantitative quality-control (QC) metrics. Establishing technical validation frameworks is essential for ensuring cross-run, cross-section, and eventually cross-site comparability as the field moves toward regulated environments.
Methods: We conducted a multi-replicate validation study using eight sections derived from a single FFPE block containing four human carcinoma tissues (lung, breast, colon, and stomach). Each slide included four tissue regions, yielding 32 total spatial transcriptomic datasets generated with the Xenium Human Multi-Tissue and Cancer Gene Expression Panel (10x Genomics). Sections at defined depths (X3-4, X14-15, X16-17, X20-21) enabled evaluation of technical reproducibility across both slide-to-slide and depth-dependent variation. Technical reproducibility metrics-including cross-replicate correlation, coefficient of variation, spatial pattern consistency, cell-type abundance stability, and gene-level variance-were assessed to define preliminary QC thresholds suitable for multi-replicate benchmarking.
Results:Initial analyses demonstrate high reproducibility across replicates, with consistent gene expression profiles, stable spatial organization of major cell populations, and low variance across serial depths. Spatial pattern concordance remained robust across all carcinoma types, and variance decomposition suggests minimal depth-related technical drift. Ongoing analyses include expanded statistical modeling and evaluation of QC thresholds that could serve as standardized criteria for platform validation.
Conclusions: This study establishes a practical framework for defining reproducibility and QC standards for Xenium spatial transcriptomics. By integrating multi-replicate evaluation with cross-sectional comparisons, we outline a foundation for reproducible spatial data generation that supports clinical translation, regulatory readiness, and harmonization across studies and institutions.
利益披露 Disclosure
T. Tran,
BioChain/CellBioScientific Employment.
J. Tian,
BioChain /CellBioScientific Independent Contractor.
E. Cheung,
BioChain /CellBioScientific Employment.
R. Gakhar,
BioChain /CellBioScientific Employment.
V. Sundaram,
BioChain /CellBioScientific Employment.