PO.BCS01.17 · 生物信息与计算

稳态T细胞重建在CAR T细胞疗法持久应答中作用的建模研究

Modeling the role of homeostatic T-cell reconstitution in durable response to CAR T-cell therapy

海报缩略图:稳态T细胞重建在CAR T细胞疗法持久应答中作用的建模研究
编号 6834 展板 5 时间 4/22 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 2 主讲 Philipp Altrock, Dr Rer Nat
分会场 Mathematical Modeling and Statistical Methods
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Philipp Martin Altrock1, Álvaro Martinez-Rubio2, María Rosa3, Arne Traulsen4, Michael D. Jain5, Frederick L. Locke6

1Hematology & Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany,2Computational Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris, France,3Biomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cádiz, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cadiz, Spain,4Department of Theoretical Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Ploen, Germany,5H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa,, FL,6H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
抗CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法是复发或难治性淋巴瘤患者一种有前景的治疗选择,然而我们对应答异质性的机制理解仍不完整。利用21例接受axicabtagene ciloleucel治疗患者的回顾性纵向数据(包括CAR T计数、绝对淋巴细胞计数、肿瘤负荷和生存情况),我们开发了一种计算建模方法,以区分两种扩增机制:稳态驱动和抗原驱动。对每例患者,我们训练并比较了三室模型,以描述正常T细胞、CAR T细胞和肿瘤细胞的动力学。比较揭示了两个不同的患者群体:可完全用稳态增殖作为CAR T扩增机制来表征的患者(稳态扩增者,10/21),以及混合型患者(稳态/抗原驱动混合扩增者,11/21)。这两组的区分依据在于基线代谢肿瘤体积(在CAR T治疗前一至两周测得)与给药时推断的肿瘤负荷之间关系的差异。值得注意的是,稳态扩增者显示出显著更好的总生存(第180天后60%对10%,p = 0.011),该组7例患者中有6例实现了长期应答。我们的发现凸显了CAR T细胞在稳态重建背景下发挥功能的能力以及量化CAR T给药时肿瘤负荷的能力如何影响长期应答的可预测性。我们的个体化数学建模方法为优化CAR T细胞疗法和理解细胞免疫疗法动力学提供了新的见解。重要的是,抗原驱动扩增的缺失增加了输注时高肿瘤负荷的负面影响。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a promising option for relapsed or refractory lymphoma patients, yet our mechanistic understanding of response heterogeneity remains incomplete. Using retrospective longitudinal data from 21 patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (including CAR T counts, absolute lymphocyte counts, tumor burden, and survival), we developed a computational modeling approach to distinguish between two expansion mechanisms: homeostasis- and antigen-driven. For each patient, we trained and compared three-compartment models to describe the dynamics of normal T-, CAR T-, and tumor cells. Comparisons revealed two distinct patient groups: patients who can be exclusively characterized by homeostatic proliferation as the CAR T expansion mechanism (homeostatic expanders, 10/21) and those of mixed type (mixed homeostatic/antigen-driven expanders, 11/21). These groups were distinguished by differences in the relationship between baseline metabolic tumor volume (taken one to two weeks before CAR T) and the inferred tumor burden at dosing. Notably, homeostatic expanders demonstrated significantly better overall survival (60% vs. 10% beyond day 180, p = 0.011), with 6 of 7 patients in this group achieving long-term responses. Our findings highlight how the ability of CAR T-cells to function in a homeostatic reconstitution context and the ability to quantify tumor burden at CAR T dosing influence the predictability of long-term responses. Our personalized mathematical modeling approach provides novel insights into optimizing CAR T-cell therapy and understanding the dynamics of cellular immunotherapy. Importantly, the absence of antigen-driven expansion increases the negative impact of high tumor burden at the time of infusion.
利益披露 Disclosure
P. M. Altrock, CRISPR Therapeutics Independent Contractor. Á. Martinez-Rubio, None.. M. Rosa, None.. A. Traulsen, None. M. D. Jain, Kite/Gilead ). Kite/Gilead Other, Honoraria/Consultancy.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索