PO.BCS01.17 · 生物信息与计算
利用空间信息化的癌症微环境主题推断实现可扩展的细胞类型和空间域建模
Scalable cell type and spatial domain modeling using spatially informed topic inference of cancer niches
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
空间分辨转录组学(SRT)揭示了癌症样本的异质性。然而,在计算上识别现代大规模SRT数据中空间组织完整层级结构的能力仍然有限。尽管已开发出许多计算方法来识别空间域和细胞类型,但大多数方法未考虑空间组织的整个层级结构,也未明确建模相邻层级之间的关系。只有少数模型(BASS、CytoCommunity和SpaTopic)对空间域及其细胞类型组成之间的关系进行建模。然而,BASS无法扩展到最新的SRT数据,而CytoCommunity和SpaTopic都需要用户提供细胞类型注释,并假设这些注释是准确的。我们的目标是从大规模高维SRT数据推断组织的层级空间组织,这需要揭示测量数据中隐藏的多尺度结构。为实现这一目标,我们使用变分自编码器(VAE)框架来学习解释所观察基因表达的低维潜变量,并在这些变量上放置生物学驱动的先验分布,从而使推断的层级结构接近实际。具体而言,我们的模型由三个耦合的人工神经网络组成:(1)多个图卷积网络(GCN),采用高斯马尔可夫随机场(GMRF)和Dirichlet先验来建模空间域;(2)一个VAE,用于重建基因表达并揭示细胞类型和细胞类型特异性基因表达谱;(3)一个前馈多层感知机,用于从空间域建模细胞类型。当应用于17K个细胞的Xenium数据时,我们的模型仅需4分钟进行推断。我们发现乳腺癌组织中的域注释将SRT数据分为三个清晰的结构组:浸润区、DCIS 1型和DCIS 2型。此外,当我们将预测结果与真值比较时,推断的细胞类型揭示了原始标签未捕捉到的恶性亚群,凸显了肿瘤异质性的额外层次。重要的是,我们还识别出免疫细胞和癌细胞共定位的微环境;这些微环境在T细胞、浆B细胞、pDC和单核细胞/巨噬细胞的比例上有所不同。我们的方法明确建模层级结构中相邻层之间的关系,从而揭示细胞类型之间的共变关系以及空间域内的细胞类型组成,这是许多此前分别建模细胞类型和空间域的方法所无法直接识别的。我们预期本研究可用于识别癌症组织中不同的病理生理特征,这将有助于揭示与癌症进展密切相关的生物学异质性。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Spatially resolved transcriptomics (SRT) has revealed the heterogeneity of cancer samples. Yet, the capability of computationally identifying the full hierarchy of spatial organization in modern large-scale SRT data remains limited. Although many computational methods have been developed to identify spatial domains and cell types, most of them do not consider the entire hierarchy of spatial organization or explicitly model the relationships among adjacent hierarchical layers. Only a few models (BASS, CytoCommunity, and SpaTopic) model the relationship between spatial domains and their cell type composition. However, BASS is not scalable to the latest SRT data, and both CytoCommunity and SpaTopic require user-provided cell-type annotations and assume that these annotations are accurate. Our goal is to infer the hierarchical spatial organization of tissues from large-scale high-dimensional SRT data, which requires uncovering hidden multi-scale structure in the measurements. To achieve this, we use a variational autoencoder (VAE) framework to learn low-dimensional latent variables that explain the observed gene expression, and we place biologically motivated prior distributions on these variables so that the inferred hierarchy remains close to reality. Concretely, our model consists of three coupled artificial neural networks: (1) multiple graph convolutional networks (GCNs) for modeling spatial domains with Gaussian Markov Random Field (GMRF) and Dirichlet prior, (2) a VAE for reconstructing gene expression and revealing cell types and cell-type-wise gene expression profiles, and (3) a feed-forward multi-layer perceptron for modeling cell types from spatial domains. Our model required 4 minutes for inference when applied to a Xenium data of 17K cells. We found that the domain annotations in breast cancer tissue separated the SRT data into three clear structural groups: invasive regions, DCIS type 1, and DCIS type 2. Furthermore, when we compared our predictions with the ground truth, the inferred cell types revealed malignant subpopulations that were not captured by the original labels, highlighting additional layers of tumor heterogeneity. Importantly, we also identified niches where immune cells and cancer cells were co-localized; these niches differed in their proportions of T cells, plasma B cells, pDCs, and monocytes/macrophages. Our method explicitly models the relationship between adjacent layers in the hierarchy, thus revealing the co-varying relationships among cell types and the cell type compositions within spatial domains, which cannot be directly identified by many previous methods that model cell types and spatial domains separately. We expect that this study can be used to identify distinct pathophysiological features in cancer tissues, which will help uncover biological heterogeneity closely associated with cancer progression.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. Park, None..
T. Zhang, None..
C. Ma, None.