PO.BCS01.17 · 生物信息与计算
开发数据同化框架以预测低级别胶质瘤患者特异性肿瘤负荷
Developing a data assimilation framework to forecast patient-specific tumor burden in low-grade glioma
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
低级别胶质瘤(LGG)通常在多年内逐渐生长,临床症状有限,但随后可能表现出不稳定的生长模式并转化为高级别胶质瘤。这给疾病管理带来挑战,产生了对模拟和预测LGG行为的新方法的需求。为实现这一目标,我们实施了一个数据同化框架,利用先前开发的能够时空预测患者特异性肿瘤动力学的生物物理模型。研究队列包括九例在MD Anderson癌症中心接受放射治疗的LGG患者。所有患者均使用磁共振成像(MRI)进行纵向监测,以评估肿瘤细胞密度(扩散加权MRI)和疾病范围(增强前后T1加权MRI、T2液体衰减反转恢复)。MRI在治疗前以及治疗后约4、5、6和12个月的随访时采集。使用半自动算法对脑和肿瘤区域进行分割。我们的生物物理模型是一个反应-扩散方程,明确考虑了肿瘤细胞增殖、侵袭和治疗应答。该模型关注非增强肿瘤区域的变化,这是LGG的标志。从时空肿瘤应答预测中得出的总肿瘤细胞计数(TTC)用于量化肿瘤负荷。数据同化框架纳入每次后续随访采集的MRI数据,然后更新其预测。预测准确度通过观察和预测TTC之间的一致性相关系数(CCC)量化,用于短期(如1-3个月)和较长期预测(如6、12个月)。使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较短期和长期预测性能。报告了描述肿瘤细胞增殖和侵袭的模型参数在每次随访的中位数和四分位距(IQR)。肿瘤在12个月内经历了中位体积变化-36.4%。模型准确预测了短期(CCC:0.71)和较长间隔时间(CCC:0.96)的TTC,两组间性能无统计学显著差异(p值:0.34)。模型估计的肿瘤细胞增殖率在4个月随访时中位数和IQR为0.10(0.06),5个月随访时为0.07(0.04),6个月随访时为0.04(0.05),12个月随访时为0.04(0.04)天⁻¹。同样,模型估计的肿瘤扩散系数在4、5、6和12个月随访时的中位数和IQR分别为0.15(0.10)、0.16(0.10)、0.18(0.06)和0.16(0.09)mm²/天。我们的初步发现证明了该模型预测患者特异性LGG行为的能力,并为开发管理LGG诊疗的个体化决策支持工具迈出了一步。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Low-grade gliomas (LGG) typically grow gradually for years with limited clinical symptoms but may later exhibit erratic growth patterns and undergo transformation to high-grade glioma. This presents challenges to disease management creating a need for novel methods to simulate and predict LGG behavior. Towards this goal, we implemented a data assimilation framework utilizing a previously developed biophysical model capable of spatiotemporally forecasting patient-specific tumor dynamics. The study cohort includes nine LGG patients treated with radiation therapy at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. All patients were longitudinally monitored using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess tumor cellularity (diffusion-weighted MRI) and extent of disease ( T 1 -weighted MRI with & without gadolinium-based contrast, T 2 -fluid attenuated inversion recovery). MRI was acquired before treatment and approximately at the 4, 5, 6, and 12-month post-treatment visits. Brain and tumor regions were segmented using a semi-automated algorithm. Our biophysical model is a reaction-diffusion equation that explicitly accounts for tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and treatment response. The model focuses on changes in non-enhancing tumor regions, a hallmark of LGG. Total tumor cell count (TTC) derived from spatiotemporal tumor response forecasts was used to quantify tumor burden. The data assimilation framework incorporates MRI data acquired with each subsequent visit then updates its forecast. Predictive accuracy was quantified via the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between the observed and predicted TTC for both short (e.g., 1 - 3 months) and longer-term predictions (e.g., 6, 12-months). A Mann-Whitney U test compared short and longer-term prediction performance. The median and interquartile range (IQR) of the model parameters describing tumor cell proliferation and invasion are reported for each follow up visit. The tumors experienced a median volumetric change of -36.4% over 12 months. The model accurately forecasts TTCs at short (CCC: 0.71) and longer interval times (CCC: 0.96) with no statistically significant difference (p-value: 0.34) in performance between groups. The model estimated tumor cell proliferation rate had a median and IQR of 0.10 (0.06) at the 4-month visit, 0.07 (0.04) for the 5-month visit, 0.04 (0.05) at the 6-month visit, and 0.04 (0.04) days -1 at the 12-month visit. Similarly, the model estimated tumor diffusion coefficient had a median and IQR of 0.15 (0.10), 0.16 (0.10), 0.18 (0.06), and 0.16 (0.09) mm 2 /days for the 4, 5, 6, and 12-month visit. Our preliminary findings demonstrate the model's ability to predict patient-specific LGG behavior and offers a step towards the development of a personalized decision support tool for managing LGG care.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Ty, None..
D. Shankar, None..
B. Panthi, None..
M. El-Jammal, None..
V. White, None..
H. Langshaw, None..
E. Konstantinopoulou, None..
H. Green, None..
A. Chakresh, None..
V. Kumar, None..
T. E. Yankeelov, None.
C. Chung,
RaySearch Laboratories ).
Siemens Healthineers ).
Convergent RNR g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Advisory Role.
D. A. Hormuth, None.