PO.BCS01.17 · 生物信息与计算
应用基于生理的药代动力学-定量系统药理学模型优化肽-药物偶联物的设计
Using physiologically-based pharmacokinetics-quantitative systems pharmacology model to optimize peptide-drug conjugates design
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
引言:肽-药物偶联物(PDC)正作为新型癌症治疗药物开发。与更大的抗体-药物偶联物(ADC)相比,它们保留了靶向治疗的优势,通过结合肿瘤相关抗原(TAA)递送有效载荷,同时比ADC具有更好的肿瘤穿透性。PDC通常表现出比ADC更快的血浆清除,因此肿瘤对药物的暴露可能更少。药代动力学受PDC中所用肽的分子量(MW)影响。基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)-定量系统药理学(QSP)模型将有助于理解PDC的药代动力学(PK)、组织分布和肿瘤药物暴露之间的相互作用。
方法:基于已发表的PBPK模型(Li等,2019)和一个遗传肿瘤QSP模型(Scheuher等,2024),通过将这两个模型与基于MW的肿瘤穿透关系相耦合,开发了一个平台PBPK-QSP模型。通过校准的模型模拟和敏感性分析,我们探究肽的参数(如分子量、对TAA的结合亲和力)如何影响PK、组织分布和肿瘤药物暴露。
结果:当肽较小时,模型预测更高的肿瘤内PDC浓度,这与较小肽带来更好肿瘤穿透性的认识一致。然而,模型预测肽大小与PDC或有效载荷暴露之间呈钟形关系。模型预测,尽管MW约86 kDa的肽比150 kDa的ADC表现出更快的PK清除,但其可产生最大的肿瘤PDC或有效载荷暴露。这与组织分布相反,因为较大的肽导致更高的非肿瘤组织暴露。进一步的敏感性分析表明,该关系对肿瘤特征(如TAA表达)或PDC对TAA的结合亲和力不敏感,但对肽大小敏感。
结论:本研究表明,该平台PBPK-QSP模型可作为一个有用的工具,通过优化PDC的肽大小来指导PDC设计和先导物选择。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs) are being developed as new cancer treatments. Compared to larger antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), they retain the advantage of a targeted therapy, binding to tumor-associated antigens (TAA) to deliver payload, while having better tumor penetration than ADCs. PDCs typically exhibit faster plasma clearance than ADCs, and therefore potentially have less tumor exposure to the drug. The pharmacokinetics is influenced by the molecular weight (MW) of the peptide used in the PDC. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetics (PBPK)-quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model would be useful to understand the interplay of pharmacokinetics (PK), tissue disposition, and tumor drug exposure of PDCs.
Methods: A platform PBPK-QSP model was developed based on a published PBPK model (Li et al., 2019) and a genetic tumor QSP model (Scheuher et al., 2024) by coupling these two models with a MW-based tumor penetration relationship. Through calibrated model simulations and sensitivity analysis, we interrogate how parameters of the peptide (e.g., molecular weight, binding affinity towards TAA) impact the PK, tissue disposition, and tumor drug exposure.
Results: The model predicted higher tumoral PDC concentration when the peptide was small, corresponding to the knowledge that smaller peptides resulted in better tumor penetration. However, a bell-shaped relationship was predicted between peptide size and PDC or payload exposure. The model predicts that a peptide with MW of approximately 86 kDa results in maximum tumor PDC or payload exposure despite exhibiting more rapid PK clearance than a 150 kDa ADC. This is in contrast with tissue disposition, as larger peptides led to higher non-tumoral tissue exposure. Further sensitivity analysis indicated this relationship is insensitive to tumor characteristics, such as TAA expression, or PDC binding affinity towards the TAA, but is sensitive to the peptide size.
Conclusions: This work demonstrated that this platform PBPK-QSP model can be a useful tool to guide PDC design and lead selection by optimizing peptide size for PDCs.
利益披露 Disclosure
Y. Li, None..
C. Zmurchok, None..
D. C. Kirouac, None.