PO.BCS01.17 · 生物信息与计算
利用模拟残留病灶和PDX数据对不可见肿瘤生长进行动态建模
Dynamic modeling of invisible tumor growth with simulated residual disease and PDX data
该海报暂无可下载的资料
AACR 官方页面
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
肿瘤休眠、早期复发和治疗耐药仍知之甚少。在新辅助或辅助治疗后,局部晚期和全身播散的不可见肿瘤细胞可能在MRI或CT扫描干净的情况下仍未被检测到而持续存在数月或数年。文献中报道的检测阈值和残留肿瘤大小各不相同,进一步增加了患者风险分层中预后准确性的复杂性。为满足这一未被满足的临床需求,我们开发了数学模型并生成了一种计算算法,以预测不可见肿瘤复发的时间进程、提高预测准确性,并在MRI/CT肿瘤成像工具的检测极限内建模不可见至可见肿瘤的转变。我们模拟了初始为1、10、10²、10³和10⁴个细胞的不可见残留肿瘤的缓解至复发轨迹,并计算了每种情况进展为3 cm³可见肿瘤所需的时间。使用倍增时间从2到30天不受限制的指数生长模型来捕捉快速、不受阻碍的肿瘤生长。随后使用改良的logistic模型来建模体内不可见肿瘤生长的时间进程,倍增时间为5至30天,以反映不同的侵袭性、肿瘤与肿瘤微环境的相互作用,以及在应对不同肿瘤缓解和延长的肿瘤潜伏期时的时间-空间-背景-治疗依赖性。为改进数学建模,我们通过将假设的肿瘤生长模型拟合到NSG小鼠中六个患者来源异种移植(PDX)TNBC模型的实时TNBC肿瘤生长曲线,在实验生物学中细化、验证和确证了若干变量因子/临床病理参数。通过将临床不可见残留肿瘤大小从10⁻⁶ mm³变化到10⁻² mm³,我们发现一旦肿瘤生长恢复,肿瘤就会迅速复发,常在定期随访预约和允许的MRI/CT成像间隔能够捕捉之前就超过临床检测阈值。我们的结果凸显了残留疾病的隐匿风险、不可见肿瘤建模的重大挑战,以及临床中复发预测的准确性不足。指数模型和logistic模型对PDX肿瘤植入数据的拟合已完成;模型确证、复发预测增强以及对这些拟合模型的正确解读,将通过NSG小鼠中新的化疗耐药PDX模型进一步加强。这项工作强调了建模不可见肿瘤生长以提高肿瘤复发预测和患者风险分层准确性的未被满足需求和关键重要性。未来工作将聚焦于将该数学模型转化为一种伴随预后工具,结合我们选定的生物标志物组合,以预测肿瘤复发风险、量化治疗疗效,并在未来实时协助和支持肿瘤科医生的决策。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Tumor dormancy, early relapse, and treatment resistance remain poorly understood. After neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy, the locally advanced and systemically disseminated invisible tumor cells may persist undetected for months or years despite clean MRI or CT scans. Reported detection thresholds and residual tumor sizes vary in the literature, further complicating prognostic accuracy in patient risk stratification. To address this unmet clinical need, we developed mathematical models and generated a computational algorithm to predict the time course of invisible tumor relapse, improve predictive accuracy, and model the invisible-to-visible tumor transition within the detection limits of the MRI/CT tumor imaging tools. We simulated remission-to-relapse trajectories for invisible residual tumors beginning with 1, 10, 10 2 , 10 3 , and 10 4 cells, and calculated the time for each to progress into a 3 cm 3 visible tumor. Exponential growth models with unrestricted doubling times from 2 to 30 days were used to capture rapid, unimpeded tumor growth. A modified logistic model was then used to model the time course of invisible tumor growth in vivo , with doubling times of 5 to 30 days to reflect varying aggressiveness, tumor and tumor microenvironment interactions, and tempo-spatial-context-treatment dependence in response to varied tumor remission and extended tumor latency. To improve mathematical modeling, we refined, verified, and authenticated several variable factors/clinicopathological parameters in experimental biology by fitting our hypothetical tumor growth models to the real-time TNBC tumor growth curves from six patient-derived xenograft (PDX) TNBC models in NSG mice. By varying the clinically invisible residual tumor sizes from 10 -6 mm 3 to 10 -2 mm 3 , we found that tumors relapsed rapidly once tumor growth resumed, often exceeding the clinical detection thresholds before the regularly scheduled follow-up appointments and allowable MRI/CT-imaging intervals could capture them. Our results highlight the hidden risk of residual diseases, the major challenge of invisible tumor modeling, and the lack of accuracy in relapse prediction in the clinic. Exponential and logistic model fits to the PDX tumor implantation data were complete; the model authentication, relapse prediction augmentation, and correct interpretation of these fitted models will be augmented with the new chemo-resistant PDX models in NSG mice. This work underscores the unmet need and critical importance of modeling invisible tumor growth to improve the accuracy of tumor relapse prediction and patient risk stratification. Future work will focus on transforming this mathematical model into a companion prognostic tool in combination with our selected biomarker panel to predict tumor relapse risk, quantify therapeutic efficacy, and assist and support oncologists' decision-making in real time in the future.
利益披露 Disclosure
B. A. Hawickhorst, None..
D. J. McWilliams, None..
J. M. Baker, None.