PO.BCS01.17 · 生物信息与计算

用于分析空间单细胞蛋白成像数据的多细胞类型模型及其在卵巢癌中的应用

Multi-cell type model for analyzing spatial single-cell protein imaging data with application to ovarian cancer

海报缩略图:用于分析空间单细胞蛋白成像数据的多细胞类型模型及其在卵巢癌中的应用
编号 6851 展板 22 时间 4/22 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 2 主讲 Chase Sakitis, PhD
分会场 Mathematical Modeling and Statistical Methods
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Chase Sakitis1, Jose Laborde2, Julia Wrobel3, Alex C. Soupir4, Christelle M. Colin-Leitzinger5, Benjamin G. Bitler6, Mary K. Townsend7, Andrew B. Lawson8, Joellen M. Schildkraut9, Shelley S. Tworoger7, Kathryn L. Terry10, Lauren C. Peres5, Brooke L. Fridley1

1Health Services & Outcomes Research, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO,2Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL,3Biostatistics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA,4Biostatistics and Bioinformatics/Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL,5Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL,6University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO,7Division of Oncological Sciences and the Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR,8Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,9Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA,10Asst. Professor, Dept. of OB/GYN, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:理解肿瘤免疫微环境(TIME)对于推进癌症研究和改善治疗策略至关重要。多重免疫荧光(mIF)是一种空间蛋白质组学成像技术,可在保存的组织中同时分析多种标志物。然而,mIF衍生的细胞丰度数据带来了统计学挑战,如零膨胀、过度离散、层级细胞关系和重复测量,必须解决这些问题才能提取有意义的洞见并增强转化影响。 方法:我们开发了一种新型贝叶斯多细胞类型分析模型,可同时建模免疫细胞丰度与临床和流行病学因素的关系,同时纳入免疫细胞群之间的生物学关系。我们将该模型应用于三项评估高级别浆液性卵巢癌TIME的大型研究:护士健康研究I/II(NHSI/II)(N=321)、非裔美国人癌症流行病学研究(AACES)(N=92)和科罗拉多大学卵巢癌研究(UCOCS)(N=103)。这些研究的mIF染色采用AKOYA Biosciences OPAL™ 7色自动化IHC试剂盒进行,图像采集使用Vectra® 3自动定量病理成像系统(0.499µm/像素)。分别使用InForm和HALO进行光谱解混和细胞表型分型。我们的分析检验了免疫细胞浸润(T细胞、B细胞、巨噬细胞)与临床变量(癌症分期、诊断年龄、减瘤状态)之间的关联,并与单细胞类型模型进行比较。 结果:在NHSI/II分析中,我们的多细胞类型模型检测到诊断年龄与分析中7种细胞类型中6种的丰度水平之间存在正相关,而单细胞类型模型仅检测到7种中的2种。这表明我们的多细胞类型模型改善了关联检测。我们还观察到,我们的多细胞类型模型对全部7种细胞类型都具有更窄的可信区间(CI),表明关联估计的准确性更高。在NHSI/II分析中以癌症分期作为预测变量时,两个模型均未检测到关联,尽管我们的多细胞类型模型相比单细胞类型模型对7种细胞类型中的3种具有更窄的CI。尽管在AACES或UCOCS中未捕捉到预测变量(年龄、分期、减瘤状态)与免疫细胞群之间的任何关联,我们的贝叶斯多细胞类型模型在两项研究中对每个预测变量的每种细胞类型都具有更窄的CI。 讨论:我们的贝叶斯多细胞类型模型提供了一个灵活的框架来纳入免疫细胞关系,非常适合利用TMA、感兴趣区域或全切片成像数据对TIME进行的癌症研究。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is essential for advancing cancer research and improving treatment strategies. Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) is a spatial proteomics imaging technique enabling simultaneous analysis of multiple markers in preserved tissues. However, mIF-derived cell abundance data pose statistical challenges, such as zero-inflation, over-dispersion, hierarchical cell relationships, and repeated measures, that must be addressed to extract meaningful insights and enhance translational impact. Methods: We developed a novel Bayesian multi-cell type analysis model that simultaneously models the relationship of immune cell abundances with clinical and epidemiological factors, while incorporating the biological relationships between immune cell populations. We applied this model to three large studies assessing the TIME of high-grade serous ovarian cancer: Nurses' Health Study I/II (NHSI/II) (N=321), African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES) (N=92), and University of Colorado Ovarian Cancer Study (UCOCS) (N=103). The mIF staining for these studies was performed using the AKOYA Biosciences OPAL TM 7-Color Automation IHC Kit with the Vectra ® 3 Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging System (0.499µm/pixel) utilized for image collection. InForm and HALO were utilized for spectral unmixing and cell phenotyping, respectively. Our analysis examined associations between immune cell infiltration (T-cells, B-cells, macrophages) and clinical variables (cancer stage, age at diagnosis, debulking status) with comparisons to the single-cell type model. Results: In the NHSI/II analysis, our multi-cell type model detected a positive association between age at diagnosis and abundance levels of 6 of the 7 cell types in the analysis while the single-cell type model only detected 2 of the 7. This indicates improved association detection, with our multi-cell type model. We also observed that our multi-cell type model had narrower credible intervals (CIs) for all 7 cell types demonstrating higher accuracy in the association estimation. With cancer stage as the predictor in the NHSI/II analysis, neither model detected an association although our multi-cell type model had narrower CIs for 3 of the 7 cell types compared to the single-cell type model. Despite not capturing any associations between the predictors (age, stage, debulking status) and immune cell populations in the AACES or UCOCS, our Bayesian multi-cell type model had narrower CIs for every cell type in both studies for each predictor. Discussion: Our Bayesian multi-cell type model offers a flexible framework for incorporating immune cell relationships and is well-suited for cancer studies of the TIME utilizing TMAs, regions of interest, or whole-slide imaging data.
利益披露 Disclosure
C. Sakitis, None.. J. Laborde, None.. J. Wrobel, None.. A. C. Soupir, None.. C. M. Colin-Leitzinger, None.. M. K. Townsend, None.. A. B. Lawson, None.. J. M. Schildkraut, None.. S. S. Tworoger, None.. K. L. Terry, None. L. C. Peres, Bristol Myers Squibb ). Janssen ). Karyopharm ). B. L. Fridley, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索