PO.CH02.01 · 化学

高通量血浆蛋白质组学实现肌少症分层并识别IGFBP轴为癌症患者肌肉损伤的关键介导因子

High-throughput plasma proteomics enables sarcopenia stratification and identifies the IGFBP axis as a key mediator of muscle impairment in cancer patients

编号 7677 展板 1 时间 4/22 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 39 主讲 Filippo Gustavo Dall'Olio, MD
分会场 Proteomics: Biomarker Discovery and Signaling Networks
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Filippo Gustavo Dall'Olio1, Wael Salem Zrafi1, Xinran Song1, Littisha Lawrance1, Fei Chen1, Pierre Busson1, Catherine Brenner1, Rebecca Ibrahim1, Marie Guinhut1, Caroline Even1, Nathalie Lassau1, Diana Cardenas-Braz1, Fabrice Barlesi2, Yohann Loriot1, Fabrice Andre1, Mariam Jamal-Hanjani3, Antoine Italiano1, Yegor Vassetzky1, Benjamin Besse1

1Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France,2Gustave Roussy, villejuif, France,3University College London (UCL) Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:癌症相关性肌少症定义为骨骼肌质量和功能的进行性丧失,会恶化预后,但缺乏单一的、被普遍接受的诊断标准。目前的评估耗时。我们旨在识别肌少症的血浆蛋白质组学特征,并揭示参与肌肉衰退的可溶性介导因子。 方法:分析了两个MATCH-R队列(NCT2517892):接受免疫治疗的晚期癌症(训练集)和接受enzalutamide治疗的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC,验证集)。外部验证队列来自TRACERx(NCT01888601,切除及复发的NSCLC)。在MATCH-R中,L3水平的骨骼肌指数(SMI)在采血后42天内通过CT/PET测量;ECOG PS用作肌肉功能的替代指标。血浆蛋白质组学使用Olink Explore 1536/3072进行。对于配对活检样本,可获得bulk RNA-seq,部分选定病例还可获得单细胞RNA-seq。在TRACERx中,骨骼肌面积(SKM)通过自动化深度学习流程进行量化(PMID: 37045997)。基于高对比病例(低肌少症,LS:高SMI、ECOG 0;高肌少症,HS:低SMI、ECOG≥2),使用在LS中富集的神经肌肉相关蛋白训练了一个XGBoost分类器。该模型生成肌少症概率(SP,0-100%)并应用于所有队列。 结果:训练队列包括99例患者(36例高对比:21例HS,15例LS)。使用50% SP阈值,该模型在18例高对比验证病例中的准确率为0.889。SP在有数据时与ECOG PS相关(p < 0.001),并在训练集和mCRPC队列中与SMI相关(训练集:男性ρ = -0.39,p = 0.004,女性ρ = -0.42;mCRPC:ρ = -0.41,p = 0.008),与TRACERx基线的SKM相关(男性ρ = -0.29,p = 0.01,女性ρ = -0.24,p = 0.07,复发时男性ρ = -0.42,p = 0.002,女性ρ = -0.36,p = 0.04)。在配对样本中,SP的变化与SKM的相应变化相关(ρ = -0.32,p = 0.006)。SP > 50%在各数据集中均与较差的生存相关(训练集:OS 5 vs 25.8个月,p < 0.0001;mCRPC:8.9 vs 21.9个月,p < 0.0001;TRACERx基线:DFS 10.7 vs 20.2个月,p = 0.007;OS 25 vs 48个月,p < 0.001;TRACERx复发:OS 44 vs 30.5,p = 0.043)。训练集和mCRPC队列中的转录组学分析显示,高SP患者中炎症通路趋同性上调,肌肉相关程序受抑制。在所有队列中,血浆IGFBP1、IGFBP2和IL6等在肌少症患者中一致升高。功能实验显示,IGFBP1/2(1 μg/mL)显著损害人成肌细胞分化(融合指数降低,MHC/beta-actin表达下降)。 结论:血浆蛋白质组学为肌少症提供了一种可扩展、无需成像的诊断方法,并识别IGFBP1/2为癌症相关肌肉功能障碍的可干预驱动因子。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Cancer-related sarcopenia, defined by progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, worsens outcomes but lacks a single universally accepted diagnostic criteria. Current assessments are time-consuming. We aimed to identify a plasma proteomic signature of sarcopenia and uncover soluble mediators involved in muscle decline. Methods: Two MATCH-R cohorts (NCT2517892) were analyzed: advanced cancers treated with immunotherapy (training) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with enzalutamide (validation). An external validation cohort came from TRACERx (NCT01888601, resected and relapsed NSCLC). In MATCH-R, skeletal muscle index (SMI) at L3 level was measured on CT/PET within 42 days of blood draw; ECOG PS was used as a surrogate for muscle function. Plasma proteomics was performed using Olink Explore 1536/3072. Bulk and, for selected cases, single-cell RNA-seq were available for paired biopsies. In TRACERx, skeletal muscle area (SKM) was quantified via an automated deep-learning pipeline (PMID: 37045997). An XGBoost classifier was trained on high-contrast cases (low sarcopenia, LS: high SMI, ECOG 0; high sarcopenia, HS: low SMI, ECOG ≥2) using neuromuscular-related proteins enriched in LS. The model generated sarcopenia probability (SP, 0-100%) applied to all cohorts. Results: The training cohort included 99 patients (36 high-contrast: 21 HS, 15 LS). Using a 50% SP cutoff, the model showed an accuracy of 0.889 in 18 high-contrast validation cases. SP correlated with ECOG PS when available (p < 0.001) and SMI in training and mCRPC cohorts ( training: ρ = -0.39, p = 0.004 for male and ρ -0.42 for female; mCRPC: ρ = -0.41, p = 0.008), with SKM in TRACERx baseline (ρ = -0.29, p 0.01 and ρ -0.24 p 0.07 for male and female), recurrence ρ = - 0.42, p 0.002 and ρ -0.36 p 0.04 for male and female). A change in SP was associated with a corresponding changement in SKM in paired samples (ρ -0.32 , p=0.006). SP > 50% was associated with poorer survival across datasets (training: OS 5 vs 25.8 months, p < 0.0001; mCRPC: 8.9 vs 21.9 months, p < 0.0001; TRACERx baseline: DFS 10.7 vs 20.2 months, p = 0.007; OS 25 vs 48 months, p < 0.001; TRACERx recurrence: OS 44 vs 30.5, p =0.043). Transcriptomic analyses in both training and mCRPC cohorts showed convergent upregulation of inflammatory pathways and suppression of muscle-related programs in patients with high SP. Across all cohorts, amongst others, plasma IGFBP1, IGFBP2, and IL6 were consistently higher in sarcopenic patients. Functional assays showed that IGFBP1/2 ( 1µg/mL) markedly impaired human myoblast differentiation (reduced fusion index and decreased MHC/beta-actin expression) Conclusions: Plasma proteomics offers a scalable, imaging-free diagnostic for sarcopenia and identifies IGFBP1/2 as actionable drivers of cancer-associated muscle dysfunction
利益披露 Disclosure
F. Dall'Olio, None.. W. Zrafi, None.. X. Song, None.. L. Lawrance, None.. F. Chen, None.. P. Busson, None.. C. Brenner, None.. R. Ibrahim, None.. M. Guinhut, None.. C. Even, None.. N. Lassau, None.. D. Cardenas-Braz, None. F. Barlesi, AbbVie, ACEA, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, Eli Lilly Oncology, F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd., institutional. Genentech, Ipsen, Ignyta, Innate Pharma, Loxo, Novartis, MedImmune, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, and Takeda. institutional. Y. Loriot, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Gilead, MSD, and Pfizer honoraria. Amgen (Inst), Janssen Oncology (Inst), MSD Oncology (Inst), Lilly (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Orion (Inst), Exelixis (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), Gilea ), institutional. Astellas Pharma, Pfizer, MSD Oncology, and AstraZeneca Travel. F. Andre, Guardant Health (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Roche (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Owkin (Inst), Novartis (Inst), N-Power Medicine (Inst), SERVIER (Inst), Gilead Sci Other, institutional - advisory board. AstraZeneca (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Roche (Inst), Daiichi (Inst), Owkin (Inst), Guardant Health (Inst) ). Novartis, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca Travel. M. Jamal-Hanjani, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Achilles Therapeutics consulted. A. Italiano, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche ). AstraZeneca, Bayer, Domain Therapeutics, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche Travel. Y. Vassetzky, None. B. Besse, AbbVie, Roche, Janssen, MSD, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Hedera Dx, Sanofi/Aventis, Springer Healthcare Ltd ), institutional.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索