PO.CH02.01 · 化学
基于血液的蛋白质组学分析用于葡萄膜黑色素瘤预后评估
Blood-based proteomics analysis for uveal melanoma prognosis
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UM)是成人最常见的眼内肿瘤。约50%的病例会发生转移,提示预后较差和生存率较低。目前尚无成熟的、基于血液的方法能够利用蛋白质组学分析准确预测UM的转移风险和疾病进展。本研究旨在检验蛋白质组学在UM风险评估中的效能和实用性。
方法:对来自27例独特患者的49份样本的血清和细胞外囊泡(EV)进行蛋白质组学分析,以区分转移性和非转移性疾病。对照来自5例皮肤黑色素瘤患者。使用ProteoSpin高丰度血清蛋白去除试剂盒完成初始血清去除。通过qEV浓缩试剂盒IZON系统提取EV。采用基于胰蛋白酶的标准工作流程,通过质谱(MS)分析去除高丰度蛋白后的血清和EV中的蛋白。在Thermo Fisher Orbitrap Lumos上采用数据依赖型MS²方法生成MS数据。Orbitrap MS¹图谱之后通过离子阱采用碰撞诱导解离进行MS²碎裂。采用机器学习开发用于转移的预测性蛋白质组特征。模型使用3052个EV和血清蛋白水平以及906个仅血清水平进行训练。通过进行500次袋外自助抽样计算模型的灵敏度和阳性预测值(PPV)。用于疾病与对照分类的候选模型被用于对来自9例独特患者的留存监测样本进行分类。此外,各样本分类的差异丰度分析使用蛋白丰度的log(2)比值,以>1和<-1为界值,分别表示丰度升高和降低。丰度的统计显著性设定为p<0.05。
结果:机器学习模型显示EV的灵敏度和PPV高于血清。对疾病(原发、监测、转移)与对照具有最强信号的EV蛋白包括免疫球蛋白(Ig)lambda可变区3-10、Ig mu重链、14-3-3蛋白zeta/delta、热休克同源71 kDa蛋白以及纤维蛋白原beta链。血清蛋白包括胰蛋白酶-3、线粒体ATP合酶复合体亚基C1、2型细胞骨架角蛋白以及多聚免疫球蛋白受体。多巴胺beta-羟化酶在血清中转移性与非转移性(原发、监测)的比较中最为突出。EV和血清的差异表达分析显示,在疾病组与对照组的比较中,与代谢、细胞组织和生物发生以及细胞增殖相关的蛋白显著富集。
结论:这项初步分析表明,对不同UM分期进行基于血液的蛋白质组学分析有助于为此类患者提供疾病诊断或病程预后。有必要在更大样本量下开展进一步工作,并在不同疾病进展阶段进行重复采样,以推进这项研究。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular tumor of the eye in adults. About 50% of cases become metastatic, indicating poorer prognosis and survivability. There is currently no well-established blood-based method to accurately predict the risk of metastasis and disease progression of UM using proteomic analysis. This study aimed to test the efficacy and utility of proteomics in the risk assessment of UM.
Methods: Proteomic analysis from serum and extracellular vesicles (EV) of 49 samples from 27 unique patients was performed to classify metastatic and non-metastatic disease. Controls were taken from 5 patients with cutaneous melanoma. Initial serum depletion was completed using the ProteoSpin Abundant Serum Protein Depletion Kit. EVs were extracted via the qEV Concentration Kit IZON system. Proteins from depleted serum and EVs were analyzed via Mass Spectrometry (MS) using a standard trypsin-based workflow. A data-dependent MS 2 method on Thermo Fisher Orbitrap Lumos generated MS data. Orbitrap MS 1 spectra was followed by MS 2 fragmentation via ion trap using collision-induced dissociation. Machine learning was used to develop a predictive proteomic signature for metastasis. Models were trained with 3052 EV and serum protein levels and 906 serum only levels. Model sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated using out-of-bag bootstrap sampling conducted 500 times. Candidate models for classification of disease vs controls were used to classify holdout surveillance samples from 9 unique patients. Additionally, differential abundance analysis of each sample classification used the log(2) ratio of protein abundances with a cut off >1 and <-1, indicating increased and decreased abundance, respectively. Statistical significance of abundance was set at p<0.05.
Results: Machine learning models revealed EVs showed higher sensitivity and PPV than serum. EV proteins with the strongest signals for disease (primary, surveillance, metastatic) vs controls include immunoglobulin (Ig) lambda variable 3-10, Ig mu heavy chain, 14-3-3 protein zeta/delta, heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein, and fibrinogen beta chain. Serum proteins include trypsin-3, mitochondrial ATP synthase complex subunit C1, type 2 cytoskeletal keratin, and polymeric Ig receptor. Dopamine beta-hydroxylase was most prominent in metastatic vs non-metastatic (primary, surveillance) in serum. Differential expression analysis of EV and serum revealed significant abundance of proteins related to metabolism, cellular organization and biogenesis, and cell proliferation in disease groups vs controls.
Conclusion: This preliminary analysis demonstrates that blood-based proteomic analysis of various UM stages can be useful in providing diagnosis or prognosis of disease course for such patients. Further work with a larger sample size and repeated sampling at different disease progression stages is warranted to advance this work.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Chandrasekaran, None..
N. Nayee, None..
J. Lacombe, None..
T. Karr, None..
F. Zenhausern, None.
J. Moser,
Novotech Other, Consulting/Advisory (2023-).
Red Arrow Therapeutics Other, Consulting/Advisory (2023-).
Pfizer Other, Consulting/Advisory (2023-).
Vilya Consulting/Advisory (2024-).
Replimune Consulting/Advisory (2024-).
Iovance Consulting/Advisory (2025-).
Sun Pharma Consulting/Advisory (2025-).
Tatum Bioscience Consulting/Advisory (2025-).
see Other Other, Research Support: NovoCure (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Alpine Immune Sciences (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Trishula Therapeutics (Inst), BioEclipse Therapeutics (Inst), FujiFilm (Inst), ImmuneSensor (Inst), Simcha (Inst), Repertoire Immune Sciences (Inst), Nektar Therapeutics (Inst), Synthorx Inc (Inst), Istari Oncology (Inst), Ideaya Biosciences (Inst), Rubius (Inst).
see Other Other, Research Support: Senwha (Inst), Storm Therapeutics (Inst), Werewolf Therapeutics (Inst), Fate Therapeutics (Inst), Y-Mab (Inst), Agenus (Inst), T-Scan (Inst), Iovance (Inst), Adaptimmune (Inst), Sparx Therapeutics (Inst), BrightPeak Therapeutics (Inst), Replimune (Inst), Orionis (Inst), Immatics (Inst), IOnctura (inst), Strand Therapuetics (Inst)
.
Horizon CME Other, Honoraria (2022-).
CurioScience Other, Honoraria (2024).
Caris Life Sciences g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Other, Caris Molecular Tumor Board (7/2021-), Caris Consultant (12/2021-).
Caris Life Sciences Other, Speakers Bureau (2022-).
Immunocore Other, Speakers Bureau (2021-).
Castle Biosciences Other, Speakers Bureau (2023-).
University of Arizona Patent, US PCT/US24/27766 (Pending).