PO.CH02.02 · 化学
尿砷形态分析与代谢指数与暴露化学特征及前列腺癌侵袭性相关
Urinary arsenic speciation and metabolic indices associate with exposure chemistry and prostate cancer aggressiveness
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:前列腺癌(PCa)是全球男性中第二常见的癌症类型。环境砷暴露被认为通过多种途径参与PCa的致癌与进展。本研究评估了砷形态及甲基化指数及其与侵袭性PCa的关联。
方法:我们分析了来自北卡罗来纳-路易斯安那前列腺癌项目(PCaP)的1,497名男性(722名黑人和775名白人)的数据,其中包括396名高侵袭性和1,101名低侵袭性PCa患者。使用HPLC-ICPMS定量尿砷形态浓度,并用肌酐校正尿液稀释。我们通过单变量检验评估了砷形态(包括无机砷[iAs]、单甲基砷酸盐[MMA]和二甲基砷酸盐[DMA])及甲基化指数(一级甲基化指数和二级甲基化指数)在低侵袭性与高侵袭性组之间的差异。我们还进行了多变量logistic回归模型分析,校正了筛查史、腰臀比(WHR)、年龄、吸烟状况、研究地点和种族。
结果:单变量比较显示,单个砷形态及甲基化指数在低侵袭性与高侵袭性PCa之间无显著差异(所有p>0.10)。然而,总无机砷(iAs+DMA+MMA)的中位浓度在低侵袭性与高侵袭性PCa之间显示出边缘性差异(1.34[0.39-2.68] vs. 1.49[0.62-3.02],p=0.06)。在种族比较中,黑人和白人男性的总iAs水平相似(1.35[0.42-2.86] vs. 1.39[0.46-2.68];p=0.83)。多变量logistic回归模型显示,砷浓度升高总体呈正相关,第2和第3三分位数显示侵袭性PCa的比值显著更高(OR:1.39,95% CI:1.01-1.91,p = 0.04;OR:1.45,95%CI:1.07-1.97,p = 0.02)。随着总iAs三分位数增加,也观察到显著的线性趋势(p-trend=0.02)。种族分层模型显示白人男性存在显著关联(OR:1.68,95% CI:1.05-2.67,p = 0.03),黑人男性关联无统计学意义(OR:1.34,95% CI:0.89-2.03,p = 0.16)。种族并未改变总iAs与侵袭性PCa之间的关联(p-interaction = 0.76)。在校正模型中,PMI和SMI与侵袭性PCa无显著关联(OR:1.01,95% CI:0.81-1.25,p = 0.91;OR:1.13,95% CI:0.96-1.33,p = 0.14)。
结论:我们的研究结果表明,尿无机砷水平升高与侵袭性前列腺癌比值增加相关,且独立于种族和甲基化效率。结果指出,无机砷而非其甲基化代谢物是前列腺癌进展的关键化学驱动因素。砷形态与前列腺癌侵袭性之间的这种联系凸显了环境化学在癌症预防中的转化意义。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common type of cancer among men worldwide. Environmental exposure to arsenic has been implicated in PCa carcinogenesis and progression through various pathways. This study assessed arsenic species and methylation indices and their association with aggressive PCa.
Methods: We analyzed data from 1,497 men (722 Black and 775 White) enrolled in the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (PCaP), including 396 with high and 1,101 with low aggressive PCa. Urinary arsenic species concentrations were quantified using HPLC-ICPMS and adjusted for urine dilution using creatinine. We assessed the arsenic species including inorganic arsenic (iAs), monomethylarsonate (MMA), and dimethylarsinate (DMA) and methylation indices (Primary Methylation Index and Secondary Methylation Index) between low vs. high aggressive groups using univariable tests. We also performed multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for screening history, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), age, smoking status, study site and race.
Results: Univariable comparisons showed no significant difference in individual arsenic species and methylation indices with low vs. high aggressive PCa (all p>0.10). However, median concentrations of total inorganic arsenic (iAs+DMA+MMA) showed a marginal difference between low vs. high aggressive PCa (1.34[0.39-2.68] vs. 1.49[0.62-3.02], p=0.06). When comparing race, Black and White men had similar levels of total iAs (1.35[0.42-2.86] vs. 1.39[0.46-2.68]; p=0.83). Multivariable logistic regression models showed overall positive association with elevated arsenic concentrations, with tertile 2 and 3 showing significantly higher odds of aggressive PCa (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.01-1.91, p = 0.04 and OR: 1.45, 95%CI: 1.07-1.97, p = 0.02, respectively). A significant linear trend was also observed across increasing total iAs tertiles (p-trend=0.02). Race-stratified models showed significant association for White men (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.05-2.67, p = 0.03) and not statistically significant association for Black men (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.89-2.03, p = 0.16). Race did not modify the association between total iAs and aggressive PCa (p-interaction = 0.76). PMI and SMI were not significantly associated with aggressive PCa in adjusted models (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.81-1.25, p = 0.91; and OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.96-1.33, p = 0.14).
Conclusions: Our findings show that elevated urinary inorganic arsenic levels are associated with increased odds of aggressive prostate cancer, independent of race and methylation efficiency. The results point to inorganic arsenic, rather than its methylated metabolites, as the key chemical driver of prostate cancer progression. This connection between arsenic speciation and prostate cancer aggressiveness underscores the translational importance of environmental chemistry in cancer prevention.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. S. Msibi, None..
M. Lee, None..
L. J. Su, None.