PO.CL06.03 · 临床研究
儿童急性髓系白血病幸存者化疗相关认知障碍的探讨
Insights into chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in childhood acute myeloid leukemia survivors
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
化疗相关认知障碍(CRCI)以往主要在儿童ALL幸存者的背景下进行研究,而分析儿童AML化疗后神经认知结局的数据仍然稀少。儿童AML的标准诱导治疗涉及使用大剂量Ara-C鞘内化疗进行CNS预防,有时联合Methotrexate,二者均为有充分文献记载的神经毒性致病因素及其与CRCI关联的致病因子。为了更好地理解标准诱导治疗如何影响儿童AML幸存者的神经认知结局,我们检索了PubMed、EMBASE和PsycINFO(2015-2025),使用的检索词包括"childhood acute myeloid leukemia"(儿童急性髓系白血病)、"neurocognitive outcomes"(神经认知结局)、"'chemo brain'"("化疗脑")以及"cognitive"(认知)。纳入标准仅限于接受过经验证的神经心理学测试和/或自我报告结局的儿童AML特异性队列。排除标准为HSCT/颅脑放疗,除非可分离出仅化疗的结果。共发现三项经同行评审的研究和一篇会议摘要符合标准。在AML特异性队列中,常规治疗与至少一个神经认知领域的损害相关,在CCSS AML队列中,两个领域出现损害的相对风险明显更高。这些研究揭示了所有领域的广泛损害,其中工作记忆受到显著影响,并在这些队列中表现出对生活质量的持久负面影响,一直持续到成年期。其他受到类似损害的神经认知领域对应于情绪调节和高效完成任务方面的问题。一项研究在将AML幸存者与人群均值比较时未发现FSIQ差异,但其研究样本量为n=12,并显示自诊断以来的时间和评估时的年龄是FSIQ的显著预测因素。此外,这些研究还支持独立于HSCT的CRCI风险,因为大型幸存者分析在区分有无HSCT的强化化疗时,无论治疗方式如何,仍发现可测量的神经认知损害。鉴于当前证据,暴露于标准诱导治疗的儿童AML幸存者存在发生CRCI的风险,工作记忆和执行功能可能受损。相当一部分经历CRCI的儿童AML幸存者可能正遭受未被识别的健康问题的困扰,因此可能极大受益于加强神经认知监测和资源支持。对于未来的儿童AML患者,认真考虑这些神经认知后果可为基于风险分层的强度调整提供依据,并在治疗期间引入有针对性的神经保护策略,最大限度减少认知病残,使患者不仅活得更久,而且活得更好。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) has mainly been explored within the context of childhood ALL survivors, whereas data analyzing for pediatric AML neurocognitive outcomes following chemotherapy remains sparse. Standard induction therapy for pediatric AML involves the use of high dose Ara-C intrathecal chemotherapy for CNS prophylaxis, sometimes combined with Methotrexate, both well-documented causal agents regarding neurotoxicity and their link to CRCI. In order to better understand how standard induction therapy affects neurocognitive outcomes for childhood survivors of AML, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO (2015-2025) using terms such as “childhood acute myeloid leukemia”, “neurocognitive outcomes”, “ ‘chemo brain' ”, and “cognitive”. Inclusion criteria were limited to pediatric AML-specific cohorts who had undergone validated neuropsychological testing and/or self-reported outcomes. Exclusion criteria were HSCT/cranial RT unless chemotherapy-only results were separable. Three peer-reviewed studies, and one meeting abstract were found which met the criteria. Across AML-specific cohorts, treatment with conventional therapy was associated with impairment in at least one neurocognitive domain, with the relative risk for impairment in two domains being demonstrably higher in the CCSS AML cohort. These studies revealed broad impairment across all domains, with working memory emerging as being notably affected, and exhibiting lasting negative effects on QoL persisting well into adulthood amongst these cohorts. Other similarly impaired neurocognitive domains corresponded to issues with emotional regulation and efficiency accomplishing tasks. One study found no difference in FSIQ when comparing AML survivors to population means, yet their study had an n=12, and showed time since diagnosis, and age at assessment were significant predictors of FSIQ. Additionally, these studies also support the risk for CRCI independent of HSCT, as large survivorship analysis differentiating intense chemotherapy with or without HSCT still found measurable neurocognitive impairment regardless of treatment modality. Given the current evidence, childhood survivors of AML exposed to standard induction therapies are at risk of developing CRCI, with working memory and executive functioning being likely impaired. A significant fraction of pediatric AML survivors experience CRCI may be suffering from unrecognized health conditions, and as such may largely benefit from increased neurocognitive monitoring and resources. As for future pediatric AML patients, careful consideration of these neurocognitive consequences could inform risk-stratified intensity adjustments and introduce targeted neuroprotective strategies during therapy, minimizing cognitive morbidity and allowing patients to not only live longer, but live better.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. Costoya, None..
C. Cabrera, None..
J. J. Jimenez, None.