PO.CL09.04 · 临床研究

阿司匹林和塞来昔布的使用与ER+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌的总生存:一项大型真实世界队列分析

Aspirin and celecoxib use and overall survival in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: A large real-world cohort analysis

编号 7863 展板 15 时间 4/22 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 46 主讲 mostafa eysha, MBBCh
分会场 Real World Impact of Prognostic and Predictive Parameters
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Mostafa Eysha1, Mohanad Elchouemi1, Harshitha Popuri1, Gaurav Periapattanam1, Arsalaan Asad2, Yasmin Youssef3, Ahmed Elkhanany4, Sumit Gaur5

1Texas Tech Univ. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX,2University of Texas Medical Branch John Sealy School of Medicine, Galveston, TX,3Mansoura university, faculty of medicine, Mansoura, Egypt,4Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX,5Texas Tech Univ. Foster School of Medicine,, El Paso, TX

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:ER+/HER2-乳腺癌(BC)的内分泌耐药常与PI3K-AKT-mTOR通路失调相关。虽然阿司匹林对PIK3CA突变型结直肠癌有益,但辅助内分泌治疗±COX抑制的随机试验未能在BC中证实生存获益,可能是由于缺乏生物标志物选择。鉴于ER+/HER2-转移性疾病在临床上富集PI3K通路激活,我们假设真实世界中阿司匹林和塞来昔布(COXI)的使用可能与该人群生存改善相关。本研究利用该亚型作为PIK3CA通路激活的临床替代指标,评估COXI使用与ER+/HER2-转移性BC生存之间的关联。 方法:利用TriNetX美国协作网络,我们通过ICD-10编码和生物标志物字段识别ER+/HER2-转移性BC患者。根据确诊后用药情况将患者分为三个现患使用者队列:(1)对照组(未使用);(2)单药COXI;(3)联合COXI(阿司匹林和塞来昔布)。采用倾向评分匹配(1:1)以平衡各队列的人口统计学、合并症、心血管危险因素及合并系统治疗(内分泌药物、化疗和CDK4/6抑制剂)。我们估算了总死亡率和主要不良心血管事件(MACE:心肌梗死、卒中和心血管死亡)的风险比(HR)。 结果:匹配后,共分析了14,955对患者(单药 vs. 对照)和1,913对患者(联合 vs. 对照)。联合队列显示出最低的死亡风险(HR,0.429;95% CI,0.379-0.486;p < 0.0001)。单药队列相比对照组也显示出显著更低的死亡风险(HR,0.629;95% CI,0.604-0.656;p < 0.0001)。相反,两个治疗组的MACE风险相比对照组均显著更高(联合:HR,1.492;单药:HR,1.641;均p < 0.0001)。 结论:在这个大型真实世界ER+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌队列中,阿司匹林和/或塞来昔布的使用与总生存的梯度改善相关。尽管治疗组的MACE风险显著更高,这一关联仍然持续。即使在PSM之后,这一差异也反映了因适应证偏倚造成的残余混杂。这提示生存改善由真正的肿瘤学效应驱动,缓解了对"健康使用者"偏倚的担忧。然而,鉴于观察性设计以及可能存在的偏倚(如永生时间偏倚和残余混杂),研究结果必须谨慎解读。该数据集中PIK3CA基因组数据稀少,无法进行基因型分层分析。这些结果支持通过前瞻性、以生物标志物为导向、专门靶向PIK3CA相关ER+/HER2-疾病的试验开展进一步研究。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Endocrine resistance in ER+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) is frequently linked to PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway dysregulation. While aspirin benefits PIK3CA -mutant colorectal cancer, randomized trials of adjuvant endocrine therapy ± COX inhibition in BC failed to demonstrate survival benefits, potentially due to lack of biomarker selection. Given that ER+/HER2- metastatic disease is clinically enriched for PI3K pathway activation, we hypothesized that real-world aspirin and celecoxib (COXI) use might be associated with improved survival in this population. This study evaluated the association between COXI use and survival in ER+/HER2- metastatic BC, utilizing this subtype as a clinical proxy for PIK3CA pathway activation. Methods: Using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, we identified patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic BC via ICD-10 codes and biomarker fields. Patients were grouped into three prevalent-user cohorts based on post-diagnosis medication use: (1) control (no use); (2) single-agent COXI; and (3) combination COXI (aspirin and celecoxib). Propensity score matching (1:1) was utilized to balance cohorts for demographics, comorbidities, cardiovascular risk factors, and concomitant systemic therapies (endocrine agents, chemotherapy, and CDK4/6 inhibitors). We estimated Hazard Ratios (HRs) for overall mortality and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death). Results: After matching, 14,955 patient pairs (Single-agent vs. Control) and 1,913 patient pairs (Combination vs. Control) were analyzed. The Combination cohort demonstrated the lowest mortality hazard (HR, 0.429; 95% CI, 0.379-0.486; p < 0.0001). The Single-agent cohort also showed a significantly lower mortality hazard compared to controls (HR, 0.629; 95% CI, 0.604-0.656; p < 0.0001). Conversely, the hazard of MACE was significantly higher in both treated groups compared to controls (Combination: HR, 1.492; Single-agent: HR, 1.641; both p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In this large real-world cohort of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, aspirin and/or celecoxib use was associated with a graded improvement in overall survival. This association persisted despite the treated groups showing a significantly higher risk of MACE. This difference, even after PSM, reflects residual confounding due to bias by indication. This suggests the survival improvement is driven by a genuine oncologic effect, mitigating concerns about "healthy user" bias. However, findings must be interpreted cautiously given the observational design and potential for biases such as immortal time bias and residual confounding. PIK3CA genomic data was sparse in this dataset, precluding genotype-stratified analyses. These results support further investigation via prospective, biomarker-driven trials specifically targeting PIK3CA -associated ER+/HER2- disease.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. Eysha, None.. M. Elchouemi, None.. H. Popuri, None.. G. Periapattanam, None.. A. Asad, None.. Y. Youssef, None.. S. Gaur, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索