PO.CL12.02 · 临床研究

Multi-cohort transcriptomic profiling identifies pathways driving high-risk biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer

海报缩略图:Multi-cohort transcriptomic profiling identifies pathways driving high-risk biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer
编号 7911 展板 16 时间 4/22 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 48 主讲 Rafael Parra-Medina, MD;PhD
分会场 Translational Biomarkers and Emerging Molecular Approaches
查看完整资料 下载 PDF 登录后可访问当前开放资料 AACR 官方页面 ↗

作者与单位

Sabrina Yepes-Rodriguez1, Rafael Parra-Medina2

1Laboratorio de Patología Molecular, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia,2Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia

摘要 Abstract

Background: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy for localized or locally advanced prostate adenocarcinoma is clinically heterogeneous, and current risk categories only partially capture the underlying biology. Multi-cohort transcriptomic integration may clarify molecular distinctions between European Association of Urology (EAU) low- versus high-risk BCR. Objective: To identify reproducible gene-expression profile associated with high-risk BCR across independent datasets and to determine whether low-risk BCR tumors differ biologically from non-recurrent disease. Methods: Transcriptomic data were analyzed from TCGA-PRAD (n=479), GSE220095 (BCR-No=101, BCR-EAU-Low=45, BCR-EAU-High=30), GSE70768 (No=93, Low=7, High=12), GSE54460 (No=48, Low=29, High=21), and GSE70769 (No=49, Low=21, High=24). Cohorts were reclassified into and adapted EAU-like BCR groups. RNA-seq data were log-transformed. All matrices were then harmonized, filtered, and aligned to curated metadata. Differential expression was performed with limma on R software using contrasts High-vs-No, High-vs-Low, and Low-vs-No. Pathway enrichment was evaluated using preranked GSEA (GO/Reactome). Results: Across cohorts, high-risk BCR tumors consistently upregulated cell-cycle and DNA-replication programs, including G2/M checkpoint activation, sister chromatid segregation, replication-stress signaling, and mitotic spindle assembly. TCGA-PRAD high-risk tumors showed strong activation of ATR-dependent replication-stress pathways. GSE220095 high-risk cases exhibited enrichment of mitotic checkpoint and pre-replicative complex assembly mechanisms. In GSE70768, key differentially expressed genes included PAGE4, PGM5, SERPINA3, and TOP2A , indicating loss of androgen-regulated stress-response programs and increased proliferative drive. GSE70769 and GSE54460 similarly converged on cell-cycle deregulation, chromatin remodeling, and ECM/EMT-related signaling. The absence of DEGs between low- and high-risk BCR groups-despite marked differences between high-risk and No-BCR-suggests that low-risk tumors form a heterogeneous intermediate state, sharing baseline expression with No-BCR cases while lacking the proliferative and replication-stress programs. Computational workflow and writing support was provided by an AI-based language (ChatGPT, OpenAI). Conclusions: High-risk BCR tumors show a strong, reproducible transcriptional signature driven by replication stress and proliferative pathways, whereas low-risk BCR tumors are molecularly similar to non-recurrent diseases. These results provide biological validation of the EAU risk stratification system and highlight the potential of transcriptomic profiling to refine surveillance and treatment decisions after prostatectomy.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Yepes-Rodriguez, None.. R. Parra-Medina, None.

在会议检索中打开