PO.CL12.02 · 临床研究

一种新型PD-L1 CAL10检测在食管癌中的性能分析

Performance analysis of a novel PD-L1 CAL10 assay in esophageal cancer

海报缩略图:一种新型PD-L1 CAL10检测在食管癌中的性能分析
编号 7912 展板 17 时间 4/22 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 48 主讲 Ibrahim Abukhiran, MD
分会场 Translational Biomarkers and Emerging Molecular Approaches
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Ibrahim Abukhiran1, Matthew G. Hanna1, Dimitrios Korentzelos1, Rajiv Dhir1, Aatur D. Singhi1, Shubham Dayal2, Joseph Chiweshe2, Xiaozhi Zhou2, Robert Monroe3, Michelle Wood-Trageser1

1University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA,2Leica Biosystems, Vista, CA,3Danaher Diagnostics, Vista, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:食管癌(ESCC)由于诊断较晚且对传统疗法反应有限,仍是一种高度致死性疾病。近期研究强调了免疫检查点通路在其发病机制中的作用,尤其是PD-1/PD-L1相互作用,它使肿瘤细胞得以逃避免疫监视。我们开发了一种PD-L1 CAL10检测,用于免疫组化(IHC)检测ESCC标本中的PD-L1。 在此,我们将这种用于IHC检测ESCC标本中PD-L1的新型PD-L1 CAL10检测与两种常用于研究的PD-L1 IHC检测进行了比较。 设计:主要目的是在≥1%肿瘤比例评分(TPS)和≥50% TPS临界值下,将PD-L1 CAL10检测与其他市售检测SP263和22C3进行比较。此外,我们还测量了每种检测类型在≥1% TPS和≥50% TPS临界值下的观察者间/病理学家间一致性(次要目的)。研究纳入了70例独特的全组织福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)ESCC病例。每个病例以4 µm连续切片。这些切片中的每一张均用H&E和抗PD-L1抗体染色:CAL10在Leica Biosystems BOND RX上,SP263在Ventana BenchMark ULTRA上,Agilent/Dako的22C3优化后用于Ventana Discovery Ultra。这些贴片玻片由3名病理学家手动评分,每个克隆的两次判读之间有两周的洗脱期。与其他检测相比,PD-L1 CAL10染色的玻片无显著背景或伪影。每位病理学家独立评分,记录PD-L1状态(阳性或阴性)的多数评分。 结果:PD-L1 CAL10检测显示出可比的检测间和读者间变异性(表1)。此外,其评分模式与其他两种PD-L1克隆相似。 表1. TPS一致率 检测间 CAL10 vs. SP263 CAL10 vs. 22C3 SP263 vs. 22C3 ≥1% TPS临界值 几乎完美(k= 0.82)中等(k=0.59)相当(k=0.67)OPA-91.2% OPA-79.7% OPA - 84.1% ≥50% TPS临界值 中等(k= 0.42)轻微(k=0.19)相当(k=0.65)OPA-92.6% OPA-89.9% OPA - 97.1% 病理学家间 CAL10 SP263 22C3 ≥1% TPS临界值 中等(k=0.54)相当(k=0.71)中等(k=0.53)≥50% TPS临界值 中等(k=0.48)一般(k=0.37)中等(k=0.42)k,Cohen's kappa统计量;OPA,总体百分比一致率 结论:初步结果提示,PD-L1 CAL10检测在ESCC标本中与其他受测PD-L1检测相当,可作为进一步转化研究评估的合适选择。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Esophageal cancer (ESCC) remains a highly lethal disease due to late diagnosis and limited responsiveness to conventional therapies. Recent studies have highlighted the role of immune checkpoint pathways in its pathogenesis, particularly the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction, which enables tumor cells to escape immune surveillance. We have developed a PD-L1 CAL10 assay for immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of PD-L1 in ESCC specimens. Here, we have compared this novel PD-L1 CAL10 assay for IHC detection of PD-L1 in ESCC specimens with two common research-utilized PD-L1 IHC assays. Design: The primary objective was to compare the PD-L1 CAL10 assay with other commercially available assays, SP263 and 22C3, at ≥1% tumor proportion score (TPS) and ≥50% TPS cutoffs. Also, we measured interobserver/interpathologist agreement (secondary objective) for each assay type at ≥1% TPS and ≥50% TPS cutoffs. Seventy (70) whole tissue formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) unique ESCC cases were included in the study. Each case was serially sectioned at 4 µm. Each of these sections was stained with H&E and anti-PD-L1 antibodies: CAL10 on Leica Biosystems BOND RX, SP263 on Ventana BenchMark ULTRA, and Agilent/Dako's 22C3 optimized for use on a Ventana Discovery Ultra. These tissue-mounted glass slides were scored manually by 3 pathologists, with a washout period of two weeks between reads for each clone. In comparison to other assays, the PD-L1 CAL10 stained slides had no significant background or artifacts. Each pathologist scored independently, and the majority score for the PD-L1 status (positive or negative) was recorded. Results: The PD-L1 CAL10 assay showed comparable interassay and interreader variability (Table 1). Additionally, its scoring pattern was similar to the other two PD-L1 clones. Table 1. TPS agreement rates Interassay CAL10 vs. SP263 CAL10 vs. 22C3 SP263 vs. 22C3 ≥1% TPS cutoff Almost perfect (k= 0.82) Moderate (k=0.59) Substantial (k=0.67) OPA-91.2% OPA-79.7% OPA - 84.1% ≥50% TPS cutoff Moderate (k= 0.42) Slight (k=0.19) Substantial (k=0.65) OPA-92.6% OPA-89.9% OPA - 97.1% Interpathologist CAL10 SP263 22C3 ≥1% TPS cutoff Moderate (k=0.54) Substantial (k=0.71) Moderate (k=0.53) ≥50% TPS cutoff Moderate (k=0.48) Fair (k=0.37) Moderate (k=0.42) k, Cohen’s kappa statistic; OPA, Overall percent agreement Conclusion: The initial results suggest that the PD-L1 CAL10 assay is comparable to the other tested PD-L1 assays for ESCC specimens and can be a suitable option for further translational research evaluations.
利益披露 Disclosure
I. Abukhiran, None.. M. G. Hanna, None.. D. Korentzelos, None.. R. Dhir, None.. A. D. Singhi, None. S. Dayal, Leica Biosystems Employment. J. Chiweshe, Leica Biosystems Employment. X. Zhou, Leica Biosystems Employment. R. Monroe, Danaher Diagnostics Employment. M. Wood-Trageser, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索