PO.MCB08.05 · 分子与细胞生物学

临床基因组学和功能基因组学支持ARID1A缺失在促结缔组织增生性小圆细胞肿瘤进展中的作用

Clinical genomic and functional genomic support for a role of ARID1A loss in progression of desmoplastic small round cell tumor

编号 7271 展板 11 时间 4/22 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 21 主讲 Tom Zhang, BA
分会场 Genomic Approaches to Define Tumor Biology and Clinical Stratification
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Tom Zhang1, Andrea Gazzo1, Christopher A. Febres-Aldana2, Juan Luis Gomez Martis1, Lee Spraggon3, Romel Somwar1, Marc Ladanyi1

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,2Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD,3UCSF READY Center, San Francisco, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景。促结缔组织增生性小圆细胞肿瘤(DSRCT)是一种罕见、致命的肉瘤,由EWSR1::WT1融合定义并驱动。DSRCT的肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)极低,复发性继发体细胞突变很少。EWSR1::WT1融合往往是唯一可识别的遗传学改变。我们利用纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(MSK)肉瘤测序队列,对110例DSRCT病例进行了全面分析,以更好地界定DSRCT的基因组图景和演变过程。 方法。DSRCT样本在MSK-IMPACT平台上进行了配对的肿瘤:正常DNA测序(2014年1月至2023年12月)。所有病例均携带EWSR1::WT1融合。在2个DSRCT细胞系中进行了全基因组的混合CRISPR-cas9功能缺失筛选(Brunello文库,每个基因4条sgRNA,靶向19,114个基因)。采用免疫组化(IHC)评估ARID1A蛋白表达。 结果。经过严格的过滤和质控,我们从初始的198个样本(123例患者)队列中鉴定出来自82例患者(pts)的110个DSRCT样本。患者以男性为主(85.4%),男女比例为5.8:1,中位年龄21.5岁(范围:6.5-55.9岁)。诊断时,50%为局限性疾病(I-II期),28.05%有肝转移(III期),21.95%表现为腹腔外疾病(IV期)。DSRCT样本的中位TMB为0.8个突变/Mb(范围:0.0-6.6);实际上,在所分析的505个基因中,47.3%未检测到突变(muts)。最常见的继发性改变是ARID1A失活突变(12.2%),其次是FGFR4激活突变(7.3%)、TERT启动子突变(6.1%)和TP53突变(4.9%)。在敲除筛选中,ARID1A、TP53和PTEN位列正向选择命中的前列,为临床基因组学发现提供了功能基因组学支持。值得注意的是,ARID1A突变在转移灶中(18.5%)比在原发腹腔内肿瘤中(9.8%)更常见,提示其在疾病进展中的作用。为探究其演化时序,我们采用癌细胞分数(CCF)分析进行了克隆分解:转移样本的CCF值显著更高(p=0.0067),克隆性突变主要见于转移灶(5/7),而亚克隆变异主要见于原发肿瘤(6/8;p=0.021),其亚克隆性经ARID1A的IHC证实。两例ARID1A突变患者同时具有原发和转移样本;在其中一例中,一个ARID1A无义突变从原发灶中的亚克隆(CCF=0.286)转变为转移灶中的克隆(CCF=1.0)。在第二例患者中,一个ARID1A移码突变仅出现在转移灶中。 结论。ARID1A突变的晚期获得和转移选择表明,这一BAF复合物组分的缺失在DSRCT进展中发挥作用。未来的研究将探讨与DSRCT中ARID1A缺失相关的病理生物学机制和治疗易感性。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a rare, lethal sarcoma defined and driven by the EWSR1::WT1 fusion. DSRCT has a very low tumor mutational burden (TMB) and few recurrent secondary somatic mutations. Often, the EWSR1::WT1 fusion is the sole identifiable genetic alteration. We leveraged the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) sarcoma sequencing cohort to conduct a comprehensive profiling of 110 DSRCT cases to better define the genomic landscape and evolution of DSRCT. Methods. DSRCT samples underwent matched tumor:normal DNA sequencing on the MSK-IMPACT platform (01/2014-12/2023). All cases harbored the EWSR1::WT1 fusion. A genome-wide, pooled CRISPR-cas9 loss-of-function screen was conducted in 2 DSRCT cell lines (Brunello library, 4 sgRNAs per gene, targeting 19,114 genes). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to assess ARID1A protein expression. Results. We identified 110 DSRCT samples from 82 patients (pts) after robust filtering and quality control from a starting cohort of 198 samples (123 pts). Pts were predominantly male (85.4%) with a male-to-female ratio of 5.8:1 and a median age of 21.5 yrs (range: 6.5-55.9 yrs). At diagnosis, 50% had localized disease (stage I-II), 28.05% had liver metastasis (stage III), and 21.95% presented with extra-abdominal disease (stage IV). DSRCT samples had a median TMB of 0.8 mutations/Mb (range: 0.0-6.6); indeed, 47.3% had no detectable mutations (muts) among the 505 genes profiled. The most frequent secondary alterations were ARID1A inactivating muts (12.2%), followed by FGFR4 activating muts (7.3%), TERT promoter muts (6.1%), and TP53 muts (4.9%). In the knockout screen, ARID1A , TP53 , and PTEN ranked among the top positively selected hits, providing functional genomic support for the clinical genomic findings. Notably, ARID1A muts were more common in metastatic lesions (18.5%) than in primary intraabdominal tumors (9.8%), suggesting a role in disease progression. To explore their evolutionary timing, we performed clonal decomposition using cancer cell fraction (CCF) analysis: metastatic samples had significantly higher CCF values (p=0.0067), and clonal muts were predominantly found in metastases (5/7), while subclonal variants were mainly observed in primary tumors (6/8; p=0.021) and their subclonality confirmed by IHC for ARID1A. Two ARID1A -mutated patients had both primary and metastatic samples; in one, an ARID1A nonsense mutation shifted from subclonal (CCF=0.286) in the primary to clonal (CCF=1.0) in the metastasis. In the 2nd patient, an ARID1A frameshift mutation appeared only in the metastatic lesion. Conclusions. Late acquisition and metastatic selection of ARID1A mutations point to a role for loss of this BAF complex component in DSRCT progression. Future studies will investigate the pathobiology and therapeutic vulnerabilities associated with ARID1A loss in DSRCT.
利益披露 Disclosure
T. Zhang, None.. A. Gazzo, None.. C. A. Febres-Aldana, None.. J. Gomez Martis, None.. L. Spraggon, None. R. Somwar, Helsinn Healthcare ). SA ). LOXO Oncology ). Elevation Oncology ). Merus ). M. Ladanyi, Gilead Sciences Other, Scientific advisory board honoraria. Merck Other, Scientific advisory board honoraria. LOXO Oncology ). Merus NV ). ADC Therapeutics ). Helsinn Therapeutics ). Rain Therapeutics ). Elevation Oncology ). SOPHiA Genetics S.A. Travel.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索