PO.TB04.08 · 肿瘤生物学
直肠癌个体化医疗策略的开发
Development of personalized medicine strategies for rectal cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:局部晚期直肠癌患者的标准治疗包括新辅助放化疗后行手术。然而,该治疗具有毒性,影响患者的生活质量。此外,20%的患者达到完全缓解,15%无反应,30-40%可能在治疗后发生转移。因此,预测患者对治疗的反应将有助于告知临床医生治疗是否为最佳选择。3D患者来源肿瘤类器官(PDTOs)因其能够复制原始肿瘤的生物学特性和药物反应性,已被用于预测患者对治疗的反应。我的项目旨在使用直肠癌PDTOs开发一种个体化医疗策略,在治疗前准确预测患者的临床反应,从而告知临床医生治疗选择。患者来源正常类器官(PDNOs)也将用于毒性评估。
方法:招募符合所需标准的直肠癌患者。通过软式乙状结肠镜采集活检样本,并立即在实验室处理以建立PDO。建立后,使用放化疗检测对患者来源类器官(PDOs)进行测试,以确定敏感、部分和耐药反应者。第0天,将PDOs接种于含5% matrigel的384孔板中。第2天,将PDOs暴露于氟尿嘧啶(0.412uM),随后进行放疗(2和4戈瑞)。第7天,使用Cytation 5多板读数仪上的CellTiter Glo 3D细胞活力检测(Promega)测定活细胞。通过使用Graphpad Prism计算50%生长率(GR50)研究治疗敏感性。
结果:迄今为止,已招募14名患者,采集了11名(78.5%)患者的活检样本。在采集的活检样本中,10份中有7份(70%)已建立,另有一份正在进行中。已完成7个已建立PDOs中5个(RC-001、RC-003、RC-006、RC-008和RC-010)的放化疗检测。RC-001 PDTOs表现出细胞毒性效应,提示对治疗完全反应。其余PDTOs显示部分效应,提示对治疗部分反应。RC-001、003、008和010 PDNOs在4Gy时达到GR50,而RC-006 PDNOs在2.2Gy时达到GR50。这些结果表明,完全反应者可能从放化疗中获益,而部分反应者可能从额外的治疗策略中获益,其中一名部分反应者可能对治疗不良反应更为敏感。
结论:本项目是澳大利亚首个使用PDOs预测患者对放化疗反应的同类项目。我们展示了患者对治疗的不同反应以及可能获取的重要信息。我们的工作有望为患者最佳治疗方案的选择提供依据,并改善直肠癌的结局。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Standard of care treatment for patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. However, this treatment is toxic affecting the patient's quality of life. Additionally, 20% of patients achieve a complete response, 15% show no response and 30-40% may develop metastasis post treatment. Therefore, predicting patient response to treatment would be beneficial to inform clinicians if treatment is not optimal. 3D patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) have been used to predict patient response to treatment due to their ability to replicate the biology and drug responsiveness of the original tumor. My project aims to use rectal cancer PDTOs to develop a personalized medicine strategy to accurately predict patient clinical response prior to therapy to inform clinicians of their treatment options. Patient-derived normal organoids (PDNOs) will also be used for toxicity assessment.
Methods: Rectal cancer patients that meet the required criteria were recruited. Biopsies were collected via flexible-sigmoidoscopy and processed immediately in the laboratory for PDO establishment. Post establishment, patient-derived organoids (PDOs) were tested using a chemoradiation assay to determine sensitive, partial and resistant responders. On day 0, PDOs were seeded on a 384 well plate in 5% matrigel. On day 2, PDOs were exposed to Fluorouracil (0.412uM) followed by radiation (2 and 4 Grays). On day 7, live cells were measured using CellTiter Glo 3D Cell Viability Assay (Promega) on the Cytation 5 multiplate reader. Treatment sensitivity was investigated by calculating 50% growth rate (GR50) using Graphpad Prism.
Results: To date, 14 patients have been recruited and 11 (78.5%) patient biopsy samples have been collected. Out of the collected biopsy samples, 7 out of 10 (70%) have been established with one currently in progress. Chemoradiation assays have been completed for 5 of the 7 established PDOs (RC-001, RC-003, RC-006, RC-008 and RC-010). RC-001 PDTOs exhibited a cytotoxic effect indicating complete response to treatment. The remaining PDTOs illustrated a partial effect indicating partial response to treatment. RC-001, 003, 008 and 010 PDNOs achieved GR50 at 4Gy whereas RC-006 PDNOs achieved GR50 at 2.2Gy. These results indicate that the complete responder could potentially benefit from chemoradiation treatment and the partial responders and could potentially benefit from additional treatment strategies with one partial responder potentially more susceptible to adverse treatment effects.
Conclusion: This project is the first of its kind in Australia to predict patient response to chemoradiotherapy using PDOs. We demonstrate varied patient response to treatment and the important information that could potentially be garnered. Our work has the potential to inform selection of optimal therapy for patients and improve rectal cancer outcomes.
利益披露 Disclosure
K. Lianos, None..
K. Olsen, None..
A. Edmundson, None..
D. Siganto, None..
M. Burge, None..
D. Clark, None..
V. Whitehall, None.