PO.MCB05.02 · 分子与细胞生物学
患者来源卵巢癌的整合基因组与转录分析揭示HRD相关特征及体内对PARP抑制的反应
Integrated genomic and transcriptional profiling of patient-derived ovarian cancers reveals HRD-associated features and in vivo response to PARP inhibition
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
引言
同源重组缺陷(HRD)和BRCA1/2改变是卵巢癌中PARP抑制剂敏感性的关键生物标志物。诸如RB1表达之类的转录特征可能进一步细化生物学亚组和治疗假设。我们对FFPE卵巢肿瘤进行了整合的DNA/RNA分析,以表征组织学分布、基因组改变、基因组不稳定性评分(GIS)、RB1表达以及所选HRD阳性模型对olaparib的体内反应。
方法
制备了32份患者来源的FFPE卵巢肿瘤块,由一名解剖病理学家(SR)审阅H&E切片,以在下一代测序前确认肿瘤含量充足。进行了全面的基因组、免疫分析和HRD评估。RNA-seq对RB1表达进行定量,将"RB1低"定义为TPM≤6.26(研究第25百分位数)。两个HRD阳性模型在皮下植入后于雌性NSG小鼠中接受olaparib反应的体内检测。
结果
该队列主要由浆液性腺癌(71.9%)组成,其次为卵巢腺癌NOS(21.9%)、黏液性腺癌(3.1%)和癌肉瘤(3.1%)。93.8%的病例存在TP53突变。37.5%的肿瘤中鉴定出BRCA1改变,25.0%中鉴定出BRCA2改变。HRD状态在34.4%的病例中为阳性,43.8%中为阴性,21.9%中为不确定。GIS评分在各HRD类别间有所差异,HRD阳性肿瘤范围为12-61(中位数29,均值32.9),HRD阴性肿瘤范围为3-41(中位数11.5,均值17.2),不确定肿瘤范围为7-32(中位数19,均值18.1)。总体而言,21.9%的肿瘤中观察到RB1低表达,且在HRD阳性病例中富集(45.5%),高于HRD阴性(7.1%)和不确定(14.3%)组。为评估HRD发现的可转化性,对两例HRD阳性浆液性腺癌进行了体内olaparib反应检测。一例BRCA2突变肿瘤(LCOV-2089,GIS=32)表现出稳健的治疗效果,肿瘤体积中位数缩小68.1%,33.3%的接受治疗小鼠出现持久的完全缓解。相比之下,第二例BRCA2突变肿瘤(LCOV-2118,GIS=17)未表现出肿瘤消退,但与未治疗对照相比,进展时间延长了>85%。
结论
总体而言,这些发现提示基因组HRD状态与体内治疗反应之间存在有意义的相关性,支持整合分析的转化相关性以及使用患者来源模型进行临床前研究的价值。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction
Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and BRCA1/2 alterations are key biomarkers for PARP inhibitor sensitivity in ovarian cancer. Transcriptional features such as RB1 expression may further refine biologic subgroups and therapeutic hypotheses. We performed integrated DNA/RNA profiling of FFPE ovarian tumors to characterize histologic distribution, genomic alterations, genomic instability score (GIS), RB1 expression, and in vivo olaparib response in selected HRD-positive models.
Methods
Thirty-two patient-derived FFPE ovarian tumor blocks were prepared, and H&E sections were reviewed by an anatomic pathologist (SR) to confirm sufficient tumor content prior to next-generation sequencing. Comprehensive genomic, immune profiling, and HRD assessment were performed. RNA-seq quantified RB1 expression, with “RB1-low” defined as TPM ≤ 6.26 (study 25th percentile). Two HRD-positive models were subjected to in vivo testing of olaparib response in female NSG mice following subcutaneous implantation.
Results
The cohort consisted predominantly of serous adenocarcinomas (71.9%), followed by ovarian adenocarcinoma NOS (21.9%), mucinous adenocarcinoma (3.1%), and carcinosarcoma (3.1%). TP53 mutations were present in 93.8% of cases. BRCA1 alterations were identified in 37.5% of tumors and BRCA2 alterations in 25.0%. HRD status was positive in 34.4% of cases, negative in 43.8%, and indeterminate in 21.9%. GIS scores varied across HRD categories, with HRD-positive tumors showing a range of 12-61 (median 29, mean 32.9), HRD-negative tumors ranging from 3-41 (median 11.5, mean 17.2), and indeterminate tumors ranging from 7-32 (median 19, mean 18.1). RB1-low expression was observed in 21.9% of tumors overall, with enrichment in HRD-positive cases (45.5%) compared to HRD-negative (7.1%) and indeterminate (14.3%) groups. To assess translatability of HRD findings, two HRD-positive serous adenocarcinomas were tested for olaparib response in vivo. One BRCA2-mutated tumor (LCOV-2089, GIS=32) demonstrated a robust therapeutic effect, with a median tumor volume reduction of 68.1% and durable complete responses in 33.3% of treated mice. In contrast, a second BRCA2-mutated tumor (LCOV-2118, GIS=17) did not exhibit tumor regression but showed an increased time to progression of >85% compared to untreated controls.
Conclusions
Overall, these findings suggest a meaningful correlation between genomic HRD status and in vivo therapeutic response, supporting the translational relevance of integrated profiling and the use of patient-derived models for preclinical investigations.
利益披露 Disclosure
K. C. Strickland,
Labcorp Employment.
Almac Pharmaceuticals Independent Contractor.
S. Barnes,
Labcorp Employment.
Z. D. Wallen,
Labcorp Employment.
M. F. Green,
Labcorp Employment.
L. V. Morris,
Labcorp Employment.
P. DePietro,
Labcorp Employment.
K. A. Amoah,
Labcorp Employment.
J. B. Jackson,
Labcorp Employment.
P. Sathyan,
Illumina Employment.
T. J. Jensen,
Labcorp Employment.
B. Caveney,
Labcorp Employment.
E. A. Severson,
Labcorp Employment.
R. A. Previs,
Labcorp Employment.
S. Ramkissoon,
Labcorp Employment.
S. C. Wise,
Labcorp Employment.