LBPO.MCB01 · 分子与细胞生物学 · Late-Breaking
基于标记的肿瘤-正常单倍型匹配揭示全基因组重组,并利用GIAB从头组装的胰腺肿瘤-正常样本发现单倍型特异性体细胞结构变异
Marker-based tumor-normal haplotypes matching reveals genome-wide recombination and haplotype specific somatic structural variation discovery using GIAB de novo pancreatic tumor-normal assemblies
该海报暂无可下载的资料
AACR 官方页面
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
准确识别体细胞突变对于癌症的早期诊断和癌症患者的最佳个体化治疗至关重要。然而,目前的体细胞突变检测大多依赖于基于标准参考基因组(如GRCh38)的读长比对推断,导致一些与参考基因组相关的假阳性或假阴性。Genome-in-a-Bottle(GIAB)联盟公开发布了多种测序数据,包括多种短读长和长读长技术、Hi-C和光学图谱,用于一组新的、经广泛知情同意的、来自同一个体(HG008)的肿瘤-正常配对样本,旨在开发高质量的体细胞突变基准,以推动测序技术和分析方法的发展。利用长读长技术和组装算法的最新进展,我们使用上述数据为正常组织和肿瘤细胞系生成并随后校订了近乎完整的染色体尺度、单倍型解析组装,从而能够将肿瘤单倍型基因组与其对应的正常单倍型基因组直接比较,以准确检测体细胞突变。在此,我们报告,通过采用遗传标记识别、单倍型组装-单倍型组装比对(SyRI、svim-asm、PAV)和读长比对方法(Severus、savana、Sniffles2等),我们实现了一个整合分析流程,用于准确检测配对肿瘤-正常样本中的单倍型特异性体细胞结构变异。我们首先识别了高质量的单倍型特异性遗传标记,以便肿瘤样本中两组单倍型组装的每条染色体都能与正常样本中对应的单倍型染色体匹配。这些遗传标记还使我们能够探索和识别该癌症样本中的全基因组重组事件,例如chr19上一系列复杂的倒位重复,其一端连接到chr22,另一端连接到chr19的对侧单倍型。随后,当使用正常样本的两个单倍型解析组装作为参考时,我们通过整合来自匹配肿瘤-正常单倍型和长/短读长比对(包括PacBio HiFi、ONT和Illumina)的多重证据,生成了两组全面的体细胞SV集。我们使用IGV对每个选定的SV进行了校订,并将它们与GIAB校订的体细胞SV基准草案(v0.4,基于GRCh38)进行了比较。虽然大多数体细胞SV在两个检出集之间相同,但我们基于组装的方法在某些重复和复杂区域中对基于比对的基准起到了互补作用。最后,我们将每个体细胞SV分配到其正确的单倍型,并生成了最终的单倍型特异性体细胞结构变异检出集。目前,我们确认了32个插入和62个缺失(大于50 bp),以及10个没有明确GRCh38坐标的易位和倒位断点,大多位于着丝粒卫星区域。虽然我们仍在继续改进基于单倍型的体细胞SV,但这些分析已经为该肿瘤-正常配对高质量体细胞SV基准的持续优化提供了更多见解。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Accurate identification of somatic mutations is crucial to early diagnosis of cancers and optimal personalized treatments for cancer patients. However, current somatic mutation detection mostly relies on inference from standard reference genome (such as GRCh38) based read alignments, leading to some reference related false positives or false negatives. Genome-in-a-Bottle (GIAB) consortium has publicly released a wide variety of sequencing data, including multiple short- and long-read technologies, Hi-C, and optical mapping for a new broadly-consented tumor-normal paired samples derived from the same individual (HG008), aiming for development of high-quality somatic mutation benchmarks to advance the development of sequencing technologies and analytical methods. Leveraging the latest advancements in long-read technologies and assembly algorithms, we have used the above data to generate and subsequently curate near-complete chromosomal-scale haplotype-resolved assemblies for both normal tissue and tumor cell lines, thus enabling the direct comparison of the tumor haplotype genome to its corresponding normal haplotype genome for accurate somatic mutation detection. Here we report that we implemented an integrated analysis workflow for accurate detection of haplotype-specific somatic structural variations in paired tumor-normal samples by adopting genetic marker identification, haplotype assembly-to-haplotype assembly mapping (SyRI, svim-asm, PAV) and read-alignment approaches (Severus, savana, Sniffles2 etc). We first identified high-quality haplotype-specific genetic markers so that each of the chromosomes from two sets of haplotype assemblies in the tumor sample could be matched with their corresponding haplotype chromosomes in the normal sample. These genetic markers also allowed us to explore and identify genome-wide recombination events in this cancer sample, such as a complex series of inverted duplications on chr19 that is attached to chr22 on one end and to the opposite haplotype of chr19 on the other end. We then generated two comprehensive somatic SV sets by incorporating multiple lines of evidence from matched tumor-normal haplotypes and long/short read mappings (including PacBio HiFi, ONT, and Illumina), when two haplotype-resolved assemblies from normal sample were used as reference. We curated each of the selected SVs using IGV and compared them with GIAB's curated draft somatic SV benchmark (v0.4, GRCh38-based). While most somatic SVs were identical between the two callsets, our assembly-based approach was complementary to the mapping-based benchmark in certain repetitive and complex regions. Finally, we assigned each of the somatic SVs to its correct haplotype and generated final haplotype-specific somatic structural variation callset. At present, we confirm 32 insertions and 62 deletions (greater than 50 bps), and 10 translocation and inversion breakpoints that do not have clear GRCh38 coordinates, mostly in centromeric satellite regions. While we continue to improve the haplotype-based somatic SVs, these analyses are already providing more insights into the ongoing refinement of high-quality somatic SV benchmarks for this tumor-normal pair.
利益披露 Disclosure
C. Xiao, None..
J. Wagner, None..
J. McDaniel, None..
F. Thibaud-Nissen, None..
J. Zook, None.