PO.MCB08.01 · 分子与细胞生物学
多组学患者来源类器官嵌入可预测靶向治疗反应和KRAS抑制剂敏感性
Multi-omics patient-derived organoid embeddings predict targeted therapy response and KRAS inhibitor sensitivity
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
临床试验仍然是当代药物开发中的主要瓶颈。基于患者来源类器官(PDO)的功能性检测是一种有前景的工具,可降低临床试验的风险,但其影响受限于队列规模小和缺乏系统性验证。我们利用最大规模的配对PDO队列、纵向临床数据、转录组数据和WGS数据,生成多模态患者表征。然后,我们评估如何利用这些表征的大规模集合来刻画药物反应表型,并映射肿瘤内在特征与靶向治疗敏感性之间的关系,尤其侧重于KRAS抑制。
方法:我们收集了135个来自结直肠癌(CRC)和胰腺癌(PDAC)的PDO,源自原发肿瘤和转移性活检。患者年龄为31-89岁,在取样时平均接受过2.6线既往治疗。每个PDO都进行了WES和bulk RNA-seq,并使用一组靶向药物(包括KRAS抑制剂)进行功能性药物筛选分析。我们从每个PDO的组学特征生成嵌入。这些嵌入被用作机器学习模型的输入,训练用于预测药物AUC值,从而能够根据基线分子谱在计算机模拟(in silico)中估计PDO的药物敏感性。在同一框架内,我们通过识别嵌入空间中富集敏感或耐药PDO的分子邻域并据此对样本进行分层,来分析KRAS抑制剂反应。
结果:嵌入捕捉了PDO集合中生物变异的主要轴,包括肿瘤类型、关键致癌改变和临床相关亚组,并能够准确预测多种靶向药物(包括KRAS抑制剂)的AUC值。预测的敏感性与实验测量的反应一致,并反映了与特定突变背景相关的已知依赖性。我们识别出与不同KRAS靶向治疗反应相关的生物标志物和通路水平特征。这些特征在交叉验证过程中可重现,并与已报道的KRAS抑制剂活性和逃逸机制一致。
结论:大规模、有临床注释的PDO集合结合多组学分析,支持构建既能预测离体药物反应又能突显与靶向药物敏感性相关的分子背景的嵌入。将这些预测模型与系统性通路解读相整合,提供了一个严谨的框架来发掘反应和耐药的转录组和基因组标志物。对于药物开发者而言,这种方法展示了如何将基于PDO的功能基因组学与AI驱动的分析相结合,以降低靶向治疗开发的风险,并为患者分层和试验设计提供依据。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Clinical trials remain a major bottleneck in contemporary drug development. Functional assays based on patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are a promising tool to derisk clinical trials, but their impact has been limited by small cohort sizes and a lack of systematic validation. Using the largest cohort of matched PDOs, longitudinal clinical data, transcriptomic data and WGS data, we generate multi-modal patient representations. We then evaluate how large collections of these representations can be used to characterize drug response phenotypes and to map how tumor-intrinsic features relate to sensitivity to targeted therapies, with a particular emphasis on KRAS inhibition.
Methods: We assembled 135 PDOs from colorectal (CRC) and pancreatic (PDAC) cancers, derived from primary tumors and metastatic biopsies. Patients were 31-89 years old and had received a mean of 2.6 prior lines of treatment at the time of tissue sampling. Each PDO underwent WES and bulk RNA-seq and was profiled in functional drug screens with a panel of targeted agents, including KRAS inhibitors. We generated embeddings from omics features for each PDO. These embeddings were used as inputs to machine-learning models trained to predict drug AUC values, enabling in silico estimation of PDO drug sensitivity from baseline molecular profiles. Within the same framework, we analysed KRAS inhibitor response by identifying molecular neighborhoods in the embedding space enriched for sensitive or resistant PDOs and stratifying samples accordingly.
Results: Embeddings captured major axes of biological variation across the PDO collection, including tumor type, key oncogenic alterations and clinically relevant subgroups, and enabled accurate prediction of AUC values for multiple targeted agents, including KRAS inhibitors. Predicted sensitivities were concordant with experimentally measured responses and reflected known dependencies associated with specific mutational backgrounds. We identified biomarkers and pathway-level signatures associated with response to different KRAS-targeted treatments. These signatures were reproducible across cross-validation procedures and aligned with reported mechanisms of KRAS inhibitor activity and escape.
Conclusions: Large, clinically annotated PDO collections coupled with multi-omics profiling support the construction of embeddings that both predict ex vivo drug response and highlight molecular contexts associated with sensitivity to targeted agents. Integrating these predictive models with systematic pathway interpretation provides a rigorous framework to uncover transcriptomic and genomic markers of response and resistance. For drug developers, this approach shows how PDO-based functional genomics combined with AI driven analysis can be used to derisk development of targeted therapies and inform patient stratification and trial design.
利益披露 Disclosure
L. Polit,
Orakl Oncology Employment, Patent.
WhiteLab Genomics Patent.
N. Trummer, None.
R. Pietrzak,
Orakl Oncology Employment.
M. Longarini,
Orakl Oncology Employment.
A. Finkbeiner,
Orakl Oncology Employment.
A. Gryspeert,
Orakl Oncology Employment.
J. Bouteiller,
Orakl Oncology Employment.
J. Caron,
Orakl Oncology Employment.
F. Jaulin, None.
G. Ronteix,
Orakl Oncology Employment, Stock.