PO.BCS01.03 · 生物信息与计算

EpiGuide: Tracking epigenetic plasticity in circulating tumor DNA to monitor tumor progression

海报缩略图:EpiGuide: Tracking epigenetic plasticity in circulating tumor DNA to monitor tumor progression
编号 2692 展板 17 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 1 主讲 Edoardo Giuili, MS
分会场 Application of Bioinformatics to Cancer Biology 3
查看完整资料 下载 PDF 登录后可访问当前开放资料 AACR 官方页面 ↗

作者与单位

Edoardo Giuili1, Renske Imschoot1, Sam Kint1, Maisa Renata Ferro dos Santos1, Lotte Cornelli1, Jef Haerinck2, Joachim Taminau2, Kathleen Schoofs1, Ruben Van Paemel3, Leander Meuris4, Sofie Roelandt1, Robin Van Belle1, Sofie Van de Velde1, Eva De Smet1, Nicolas Debusschere1, Celine Everaert1, Geert Berx5, Katleen De Preter6

1VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, Gent, Belgium,2Center for Inflammation Research, VIB-UGent, Gent, Belgium,3Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Gent, Belgium,4Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Ghent, Gent, Belgium,5Center for Inflammation Research, VIB-UGent, Ghent, Belgium,6VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, Ghent, Belgium

摘要 Abstract

Cell state transitions such as epithelial-to-mesenchymal plasticity (EMP) play an important role in the progression of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and are strongly associated with therapy resistance. These transitions are hypothesized to be largely regulated by DNA methylation (DNAm) changes, which are retained in tumor-derived plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Therefore, detecting EMP-related DNAm signatures in cfDNA offers a minimally invasive strategy to monitor tumor dynamics in liquid biopsies. However, estimating the tumoral cfDNA EMP fractions is challenging because liquid biopsy samples contain a mixture of cfDNA originating from both cancer and healthy cells. As a solution, DNAm deconvolution algorithms can be adopted to estimate tumoral cfDNA fractions in liquid biopsy samples. In the last decade a high number of DNAm deconvolution tools have been developed. However, despite the need to identify the most effective deconvolution tools for tumor fraction estimation, no benchmarking study has specifically focused on this task. Therefore, we developed DecoNFlow, an automated Nextflow pipeline including 12 DNAm deconvolution tools and 3 differential methylation analysis tools. This is the most comprehensive pipeline for DNAm deconvolution to date, which allowed us to perform a benchmarking of 12 deconvolution tools using 3.5K in silico mixtures spanning multiple tumor types, sequencing depths, marker-selection strategies and profiling technologies (paper in review). We show that CelFiE is the overall top-performing tool across multiple evaluation criteria. In a subsequent proof-of-concept study, we assessed EMP monitoring in vivo using the MMTV-PyMT mouse model, which develops TNBC-like tumors which spontaneously undergo EMP. First, several cell lines have been derived from primary tumors of this model and characterized. These cell lines exhibited distinct EMP states (epithelial or mesenchymal) or stably co-existing EMP states. Following orthotopic injection of these cell lines into mice, we performed methylation profiling on both tumors and plasma cfDNA. Tumor EMP state fractions were estimated using CelFiE and a DNAm EMP atlas of MMTV-PyMT tumors as reference, consisting of both single-cell and bulk EMP DNAm markers. We demonstrated that EMP states can be differentially detected in cfDNA, and that mice injected with mixed cell lines show significantly higher tumoral cfDNA fractions than those injected with epithelial-only lines, suggesting that coexistence of multiple EMP states may promote higher tumor burden. In summary, this study presents a robust analytical and computational pipeline that allows to monitor EMP in a minimally invasive way through cfDNA DNAm analysis. In future, clinical application of this approach is expected to be instrumental for timely identification of cancer patients at risk for therapy resistance through epigenetic plasticity.
利益披露 Disclosure
E. Giuili, None.. R. Imschoot, None.. S. Kint, None.. M. Ferro dos Santos, None.. L. Cornelli, None.. J. Haerinck, None.. J. Taminau, None.. K. Schoofs, None.. R. Van Paemel, None.. L. Meuris, None.. S. Roelandt, None.. R. Van Belle, None.. S. Van de Velde, None.. E. De Smet, None.. N. Debusschere, None.. C. Everaert, None.. G. Berx, None.. K. De Preter, None.

在会议检索中打开