PO.CL01.07 · 临床研究

Machine learning classifier for cancer type identification via multi-feature genome-wide cfDNA profiling

海报缩略图:Machine learning classifier for cancer type identification via multi-feature genome-wide cfDNA profiling
编号 1123 展板 4 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 44 主讲 Haimeng Tang, MS
分会场 Liquid Biopsies: Circulating Nucleic Acids 1
查看完整资料 下载 PDF 登录后可访问当前开放资料 AACR 官方页面 ↗

作者与单位

Yunjian Zhang1, Liang Liu2, Hua Bao3, Haimeng Tang3, Ke Xu3, Hao Zhang4, Song Wang3, Shuang Chang3, Dongqin Zhu3, Zongyao Huang5, Zheng Wang2, Liu Yang6, Bingzhong Zhang7, Ji Tao8, Wenhua Liang9, Jierong Chen10, Shanshan Yang3, Xue Wu3, Yang Shao3, Wenquan Wang2, Dongyuan Zhu11

1First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China,2Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China,3Geneseeq Techonolgy Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada,4Xuzhou Medical University, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China,5University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, China,6Colorectal Center, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China,7Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China,8Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China,9The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China,10Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, China,11Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China

摘要 Abstract

Background: Determination of the tissue of origin (TOO) of cancer is essential for appropriate clinical management and treatment selection. Liquid biopsy using circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers a non-invasive approach for cancer detection and TOO prediction. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a tumor-derived fraction of cfDNA, carries genomic and epigenomic signatures reflective of its origin. Recent advances in machine learning have enable the development of models to predict TOO from cfDNA profiles. However, current methods show variable performance, particularly in samples with low ctDNA fractions (ctDNA < 3%), and accuracy remains inconsistent across different cancer types. Methods: We developed a TOO classifier using whole genome cfDNA profiles from 1814 patients across 17 cancer types. Multiple distinct cfDNA features were extracted to reveal diverse cancer-associated alterations, including copy number variations, repeat elements, fragment end motifs associated with DNA methylation, fragment size distribution and coverage, microsatellite instability, mutational signatures, nucleosome occupancy, tissue-specific fragmentation patterns, and the presence of cancer-associated viral DNA. Model performance was evaluated in an independent external cohort of 1221 patients. Additional tests were conducted in cohorts of patients with cancers of unknown primary (CUP) and multiple primary cancers (MPC). Results: Our cancer classifier achieved an overall top 1 accuracy of 78% and top 2 accuracy of 89% in the training cohort, with consistently high accuracy across all cancer types. In the independent validation cohort, the model maintained robust performance, with top 1 and top 2 accuracies of 80% and 90%, respectively. Sensitivity increased with the advancing cancer stage, improving from 66.8% in stage I to 86.2% in stage IV. Among 612 low-ctDNA samples, 435 cases (71.1%) were correctly classified. The classifier also showed strong potential in CUP, with 11 of 15 cases (73.3%) aligning with the clinically suspected primary site. Furthermore, among 20 MPC cases with two primary sites, both were correctly identified within the top three predictions in 9 cases. In 3 MPC patients with three primary sites, two of the three sites were accurately captured among the top three predictions. Conclusion: Our cfDNA-based machine learning classifier provides a robust, non-invasive approach for accurate cancer tissue-of-origin identification. Integrating 11 distinct cfDNA-derived fragmentomic, genomic, epigenomic, and microbiomic features, the model achieved high accuracy across multiple cancer types and maintained strong performance in low-ctDNA samples. Its promising results in CUP and MPC further highlight its potential clinical utility in resolving diagnostically challenging cases and guiding precision oncology applications.
利益披露 Disclosure
Y. Zhang, None.. L. Liu, None. H. Bao, Geneseeq Technology Inc. Employment. H. Tang, Geneseeq Technology Inc. Employment. K. Xu, Geneseeq Technology Inc. Employment. H. Zhang, None. S. Wang, Geneseeq Technology Inc. Employment. S. Chang, Geneseeq Technology Inc. Employment. D. Zhu, Geneseeq Technology Inc. Employment. Z. Huang, None.. Z. Wang, None.. L. Yang, None.. B. Zhang, None.. J. Tao, None.. W. Liang, None.. J. Chen, None. S. Yang, Geneseeq Technology Inc. Employment. X. Wu, Geneseeq Technology Inc. Employment. Y. Shao, Geneseeq Technology Inc. Employment. W. Wang, None.. D. Zhu, None.

在会议检索中打开