Multiple myeloma risk classification of CoMMpass using Consensus Genomic Staging identifies differences between patients with high and low African genetic ancestry

Background: Multiple myeloma is the second most common adult blood cancer and remains incurable, despite recent advances. The IMWG/IMS recently published updated risk criteria, Consensus Genomic Staging (CGS), combining genomic events with clinical measures to identify high-risk patients (Avet-Loiseau, et al. JCO 2025). We applied CGS risk criteria to baseline samples from the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation CoMMpass Study (NCT01454297), a prospective, longitudinal observational study that enrolled more than1100 participants between 2011-2017. Methods: We assessed patient risk following CGS criteria. Criteria 1: del(17p), with a cutoff of >20% clonal fraction, and/or TP53 mutation. Criteria 2: an IgH translocation including t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) along with 1q+ and/or del(1p32). Criteria 3: monoallelic del(1p32) along with 1q+ or biallelic del(1p32). Criteria 4: beta-2 microglobulin >= 5.5 mg/L with normal creatinine. Patients meeting one or more criteria were classified as High Risk. To test if risk showed association with genetic ancestry, we grouped patients into those with high African genetic ancestry and those with low African genetic ancestry. Genetic ancestry was measured using ADMIXTURE in comparison to 1000 Genomes. Results: We evaluated the CGS risk status of 877 CoMMpass patients, finding 69.2% (573/828) to be Standard Risk (SR) and 30.8% (255/828) to be High Risk (HR). HR patients showed worse progression-free survival (median PFS 26.3 months vs. 42.5 months; log rank test, p < 0.0001) and overall survival (median OS 63.9 months vs. median not reached; p < 0.0001). 10.6% (91/858) of patients met Criteria 1, 10.7% (93/873) met Criteria 2, 5.6% (49/877) met Criteria 3, and 8.7% (73/835) met Criteria 4. We found 14.2% (123/867) of patients to have high African-like genetic ancestry (AFR-high) and 85.8% (744/867) to have low African-like genetic ancestry (AFR-low). We observed significantly fewer HR patients within the AFR-high group (20%, 23/115) than in the AFR-low group (32.4%, 231/712) (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.0065). The AFR-high group met HR criteria at a lower rate across all criteria, but only with Criteria 3 was the difference significant (p-value = 0.03). Higher levels of creatinine in AFR-high patients may have impacted meeting the normal creatinine requirement of Criteria 4. Conclusions: HR patients comprise 30.8% of CoMMpass subjects and show significantly worse PFS and OS than SR patients. AFR-high patients met HR criteria at a lower rate than AFR-low patients according to the CGS criteria. Clinical trials that utilize CGS criteria to determine patient eligibility may be challenged to enroll a representative patient population, including AFR-high patients. Screening and eligibility criteria should be carefully considered to mitigate potential enrollment disparities.