PO.MCB05.02 · 分子与细胞生物学

Interplay of circadian cryptochrome 1 (CRY1) and DNA repair in prostate cancer (PCa)

海报缩略图:Interplay of circadian cryptochrome 1 (CRY1) and DNA repair in prostate cancer (PCa)
编号 529 展板 20 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 21 主讲 Arwa Fallatah, PhD
分会场 Mechanisms and Targets in DNA Damage Repair
查看完整资料 下载 PDF 登录后可访问当前开放资料 AACR 官方页面 ↗

作者与单位

Arwa Fallatah1, Stefan DiFazio1, Lakshmi Ravindranath1, Orly Richter1, Christopher McNair2, Ayesha Shafi1

1Center for Prostate Disease Research, Bethesda, MD,2Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA

摘要 Abstract

Background: Disruptions in circadian rhythm are linked to prostate cancer (PCa). Previous studies indicate that the core circadian clock factor cryptochrome 1 (CRY1) is pro-tumorigenic and associated with poor clinical outcomes in PCa. Beyond its transcriptional co-regulatory function, CRY1 was recently identified as a modulator of DNA damage repair (DDR) in advanced PCa. Molecular and pharmacological suppression of CRY1 impairs PCa cell growth, induces G2/M arrest, and disrupts homologous recombination (HR)-mediated DNA repair. However, the mechanistic role of CRY1 in disease progression from hormone therapy sensitive (HTS) to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains incompletely defined. Methods: We employed doxycycline-inducible CRY1 knockdown models of both HTS, using LNCaP cell line, and CRPC, using C4-2 cell line, along with pharmacological strategies to recapitulate physiologically relevant CRY1 modulation. Transcriptomic profiling, DDR-focused CRISPR knockout (KO) screening, and downstream functional assays were used to define CRY1-dependent transcriptional and repair programs across disease stages. This allows for the identification of potential novel targeted therapies as well as predicts patient response to DDR targeted therapy. Results: Transcriptomic analyses revealed distinct CRY1-regulated gene networks in HTS versus CRPC models. In HTS, CRY1 activity was associated with pathways including base excision repair, mismatch repair, and G2/M checkpoint regulation, while in CRPC, CRY1 was specifically linked to HR-mediated DNA repair. DDR-targeted CRISPR screening further demonstrated that CRY1 promotes tumorigenesis via nucleotide excision repair in HTS and shifts to HR reliance in CRPC, suggesting stage-specific rewiring of repair pathway choice driven by CRY1. These findings identify a novel mechanism of DDR regulation across PCa progression. Conclusions: In sum, our study reveals that CRY1 supports PCa progression via distinct DDR mechanisms in HTS and CRPC. Thus, targeting CRY1, alonge or in combination with DDR inhibitors, offers a promising therapeutic strategy tailored to disease stage in PCa.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Fallatah, None.. S. DiFazio, None.. L. Ravindranath, None.. O. Richter, None.. C. McNair, None.. A. Shafi, None.

在会议检索中打开